Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <BLU180-W5991BA542AEB6203BDC3B2AC2B0@phx.gbl>
From: Bob Raide <rjraide@hotmail.com>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:17:30 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <52485E9B.2020309@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
References: <5247E37F.7080300@gmx.de>
 <52485B7C.3000708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>,<52485E9B.2020309@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_d7b2cafc-465e-4827-92b9-facd2e3d9416_"
Subject: RE: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

--_d7b2cafc-465e-4827-92b9-facd2e3d9416_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Couldn't do anything without this reflector.  No one knows what the hell is=
 going on without it.  If I see something interesting I go right to it.  Wo=
uld never know otherwise. =20
I never get anything on the yahoo reflector.  I don't know if it gets used[=
???]  Was very interesting=2C I tried for a year to get this reflector and =
never was successful.  I put the word "end" at the end of the message and i=
t was done!  I must have sent 50 times to try to join.  Always same message=
 that they would get back to me with an answer and never hear anything!
=20
Date: Sun=2C 29 Sep 2013 19:08:43 +0200
From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany

=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
  =0A=
=0A=
=0A=
PS: Even QRSS-60 is more promising than WSPR-15 for initial=0A=
experiments. So the simple modes are still the right way to go.=20
=0A=

=0A=
PPS: I find a small part of this quick success is also due to the=0A=
existence of this reflecor which helps to motivate active (RX=0A=
or TX) LF/MF/VLF radio amateurs to motivate each other  :-)
=0A=

=0A=
73=2C Stefan
=0A=

=0A=
Am 29.09.2013 18:55=2C schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:=0A=
=0A=
  =0A=
  =0A=
Hello Bob and Hartmut=2C=20
=0A=
 =20
=0A=
My congratulation for that success. Both of you must have a very=0A=
suitable system to radiate respectively receive a signal on the 4000m=0A=
band!=20
=0A=
 =20
=0A=
Bob=2C can you transmit DFCW? If 4000m behaves reasonable like 2200m=2C the=
n=0A=
DFCW-180 should be a good choice! It is a bit slower and may allow=0A=
reception of your signal even for station with lower RX sensitivity=0A=
than Hartmut offers. Also DFCW gives you a better ID since the=0A=
frequency shift is another indicator which separates your signal from=0A=
random QRM...
=0A=
 =20
=0A=
73=2C GL=2C Stefan/DK7FC
=0A=
 =20
=0A=
 =20
=0A=
Am 29.09.2013 10:23=2C schrieb Hartmut Wolff:=0A=
  Bob=2C=20
=0A=
   =20
=0A=
the capture is a bit tiny=2C because I used a qrss 120 screen. Your=0A=
signal was drifting and you crossed the Loran line just before 04:00.=0A=
For the future a frequency 1 Hz lower would be better.=20
=0A=
   =20
=0A=
73=20
=0A=
   =20
=0A=
Hartmut=20
=0A=
  =0A=
 		 	   		  =

--_d7b2cafc-465e-4827-92b9-facd2e3d9416_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt=3B
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>Couldn't do anything without thi=
s reflector.&nbsp=3B No one knows what the hell is going on without it.&nbs=
p=3B If I see something&nbsp=3Binteresting I go right to it.&nbsp=3B Would =
never know otherwise.&nbsp=3B <BR>I never get anything on the yahoo reflect=
or.&nbsp=3B I don't know if it gets used[???]&nbsp=3B Was very interesting=
=2C I tried for a year to get this reflector and never was successful.&nbsp=
=3B I put the word "end" at the end of the message and it was done!&nbsp=3B=
 I must have sent 50 times to try to join.&nbsp=3B Always same message that=
 they would get back to me with an answer and never hear anything!<br>&nbsp=
=3B<BR><div><hr id=3D"stopSpelling">Date: Sun=2C 29 Sep 2013 19:08:43 +0200=
<br>From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de<br>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacks=
heep.org<br>Subject: Re: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany<br><br>=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
  =0A=
=0A=
=0A=
PS: Even QRSS-60 is more promising than WSPR-15 for initial=0A=
experiments. So the simple modes are still the right way to go. <br>=0A=
<br>=0A=
PPS: I find a small part of this quick success is also due to the=0A=
existence of this reflecor which helps to motivate <u>active</u> (RX=0A=
or TX) LF/MF/VLF radio amateurs to motivate each other&nbsp=3B :-)<br>=0A=
<br>=0A=
73=2C Stefan<br>=0A=
<br>=0A=
Am 29.09.2013 18:55=2C schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:=0A=
<blockquote cite=3D"mid:52485B7C.3000708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de">=0A=
  =0A=
  <title></title>=0A=
Hello Bob and Hartmut=2C <br>=0A=
  <br>=0A=
My congratulation for that success. Both of you must have a very=0A=
suitable system to radiate respectively receive a signal on the 4000m=0A=
band! <br>=0A=
  <br>=0A=
Bob=2C can you transmit DFCW? If 4000m behaves reasonable like 2200m=2C the=
n<b>=0A=
DFCW-180</b> should be a good choice! It is a bit slower and may allow=0A=
reception of your signal even for station with lower RX sensitivity=0A=
than Hartmut offers. Also DFCW gives you a better ID since the=0A=
frequency shift is another indicator which separates your signal from=0A=
random QRM...<br>=0A=
  <br>=0A=
73=2C GL=2C Stefan/DK7FC<br>=0A=
  <br>=0A=
  <br>=0A=
Am 29.09.2013 10:23=2C schrieb Hartmut Wolff:=0A=
  <blockquote cite=3D"mid:5247E37F.7080300@gmx.de">Bob=2C <br>=0A=
    <br>=0A=
the capture is a bit tiny=2C because I used a qrss 120 screen. Your=0A=
signal was drifting and you crossed the Loran line just before 04:00.=0A=
For the future a frequency 1 Hz lower would be better. <br>=0A=
    <br>=0A=
73 <br>=0A=
    <br>=0A=
Hartmut <br>=0A=
  </blockquote>=0A=
</blockquote></div> 		 	   		  </div></body>
</html>=

--_d7b2cafc-465e-4827-92b9-facd2e3d9416_--