Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp72069pad; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:26:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.189.205 with SMTP id gk13mr10542459wic.12.1380475618148; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g17si3079532wiv.30.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VQKRi-000621-BD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:06:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VQKRh-00061s-RN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:06:13 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s9.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.20]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VQKRf-0005U2-OY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:06:12 +0100 Received: from BLU180-W39 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s9.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:06:10 -0700 X-TMN: [ehpVwuCLFvmYz8KPBWSsKyail4Zfh+fu] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:06:09 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <52485B7C.3000708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <5247E37F.7080300@gmx.de>,<52485B7C.3000708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2013 17:06:10.0456 (UTC) FILETIME=[31F84180:01CEBD36] X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan; I notice you always use DFCW. I also noticed John Andrews does too the last time I saw him on 73. Yes I think it is easy for me to change. I use the ON7YD [hope I have his call correct] program and feed my SSB exciter with the laptop with that program and I see it available on his "options" page. I was going to ask you why you use it. Now I know and I will try it tonite-Bob [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.20 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b707651713bcd4ad9db4bb0f5d794041 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_7e3b5567-3419-4754-b6f3-199abb47a230_" Subject: RE: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1369 --_7e3b5567-3419-4754-b6f3-199abb47a230_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan=3B I notice you always use DFCW. I also noticed John Andrews does too the las= t time I saw him on 73. Yes I think it is easy for me to change. I use th= e ON7YD [hope I have his call correct] program and feed my SSB exciter with= the laptop with that program and I see it available on his "options" page.= I was going to ask you why you use it. Now I know and I will try it toni= te-Bob =20 Date: Sun=2C 29 Sep 2013 18:55:24 +0200 From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hello Bob and Hartmut=2C=20 =0A= =0A= My congratulation for that success. Both of you must have a very=0A= suitable system to radiate respectively receive a signal on the 4000m=0A= band!=20 =0A= =0A= Bob=2C can you transmit DFCW? If 4000m behaves reasonable like 2200m=2C the= n=0A= DFCW-180 should be a good choice! It is a bit slower and may allow=0A= reception of your signal even for station with lower RX sensitivity=0A= than Hartmut offers. Also DFCW gives you a better ID since the=0A= frequency shift is another indicator which separates your signal from=0A= random QRM... =0A= =0A= 73=2C GL=2C Stefan/DK7FC =0A= =0A= =0A= Am 29.09.2013 10:23=2C schrieb Hartmut Wolff:=0A= Bob=2C=0A= =20 =0A= =20 =0A= the capture is a bit tiny=2C because I used a qrss 120 screen. Your=0A= signal was drifting and you crossed the Loran line just before 04:00.=0A= For the future a frequency 1 Hz lower would be better.=0A= =20 =0A= =20 =0A= 73=0A= =20 =0A= =20 =0A= Hartmut=0A= =20 =0A= = --_7e3b5567-3419-4754-b6f3-199abb47a230_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan=3B
I notice you always= use =3BDFCW. =3B I also noticed John Andrews does too the last tim= e I saw him on 73. =3B Yes I think it is easy for me to change. =3B= I use the ON7YD [hope I have his call correct] program and feed my SSB exc= iter with the laptop =3Bwith that program and I see it available on his= "options" page. =3B I was going to ask you why you use it. =3B Now= I know and I will try it tonite-Bob
 =3B

Date: Sun=2C 29 Sep 2013 18:55:24 +0200
From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.= uni-heidelberg.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: 7= 4550 XRS in Germany

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hello Bob and Hartmut=2C
=0A=
=0A= My congratulation for that success. Both of you must have a very=0A= suitable system to radiate respectively receive a signal on the 4000m=0A= band!
=0A=
=0A= Bob=2C can you transmit DFCW? If 4000m behaves reasonable like 2200m=2C the= n=0A= DFCW-180 should be a good choice! It is a bit slower and may allow=0A= reception of your signal even for station with lower RX sensitivity=0A= than Hartmut offers. Also DFCW gives you a better ID since the=0A= frequency shift is another indicator which separates your signal from=0A= random QRM...
=0A=
=0A= 73=2C GL=2C Stefan/DK7FC
=0A=
=0A=
=0A= Am 29.09.2013 10:23=2C schrieb Hartmut Wolff:=0A=
Bob=2C=0A=
=0A=
=0A= the capture is a bit tiny=2C because I used a qrss 120 screen. Your=0A= signal was drifting and you crossed the Loran line just before 04:00.=0A= For the future a frequency 1 Hz lower would be better.=0A=
=0A=
=0A= 73=0A=
=0A=
=0A= Hartmut=0A=
=0A=
= --_7e3b5567-3419-4754-b6f3-199abb47a230_--