Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <BLU180-W391A0FBE3E76395FA5C58AC290@phx.gbl>
From: Bob Raide <rjraide@hotmail.com>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:51:34 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <52459149.7070307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
References: <5244AB81.8020503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
 <BLU180-W764086BDA07C1241058B94AC280@phx.gbl>,<5245765A.3030301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
 <BLU180-W95E6C2B7338DA819CBCCE7AC290@phx.gbl>,<52459149.7070307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_fe32c7d6-e17f-4c75-a118-90c2acac11fe_"
Subject: RE: LF: QRSS OP WSPR
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

--_fe32c7d6-e17f-4c75-a118-90c2acac11fe_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Stefan=3B
I remember Jay and John Andrews ran those tests. As my memory serves me you=
 are correct. =20
F6CNI did comment yesterday that 74.5-6 is best for UK/EURO.  I will give i=
t a try.  I think I can use 137 WSPR15 as call sign will designate differen=
ce in bands.  I will shoot Joe Taylor an e mail and get his comments.
Bob
=20
Date: Fri=2C 27 Sep 2013 16:08:09 +0200
From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: QRSS OP WSPR

=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
  =0A=
=0A=
=0A=
Bob=2C=20
=0A=

=0A=
For QRSS reception on 4000m=2C better ask G4WGT or F5WK or F6CNI for a=0A=
preferred frequency. Ort maybe TF3HZ? He is reading the reflector as=0A=
well. At least i saw the flag from Iceland on the flagcounter of=0A=
SC8CS's new grabber which was announced here :-))
=0A=

=0A=
BTW=2C regarding OP65=2C Jay/W1VD recently did some tests comparing OP4 and=
=0A=
WSPR-2. The summary was something like "WSPR-2 is as "sensitive" as=0A=
OP8" !!. Correct me Jay. That means=2C instead transmitting OP65=2C you=0A=
could use WSPR-15 instead and may have 4 times higher probabbility to=0A=
get a decode=2C e.g. if there is just a short propagation window like on=0A=
137 kHz.
=0A=

=0A=
73=2C Stefan
=0A=

=0A=
Am 27.09.2013 15:55=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A=
=0A=
  =0A=
  Stefan=3B
=0A=
It is same here.  But you can't do everything-transmit and receive at=0A=
same time no go. =20
=0A=
I have a similar PC got from neighbor last season a Samsung less than=0A=
two years old.  Big difference from little ACER PC!
=0A=
I think I am going to stick with QRSS 60 for anymore 73 kHz work.  What=0A=
freq might be best for UK/Euro work?  I understand that 72.4 is not=0A=
good in UK/Europe.  Seems that 74.5-74.6 seems best from comments I am=0A=
getting?
=0A=
Any suggestions appreciated-Bob
=0A=
=20
=0A=
  =0A=
 		 	   		  =

--_fe32c7d6-e17f-4c75-a118-90c2acac11fe_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt=3B
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>Stefan=3B<BR>I remember Jay and =
John Andrews ran those tests. As my memory serves me you are correct.&nbsp=
=3B <BR>F6CNI did comment yesterday that 74.5-6 is best for UK/EURO.&nbsp=
=3B I will&nbsp=3Bgive it a try.&nbsp=3B I think I can use 137 WSPR15 as ca=
ll sign will designate difference in bands.&nbsp=3B I will shoot Joe Taylor=
 an e mail and get his comments.<BR>Bob<br>&nbsp=3B<BR><div><hr id=3D"stopS=
pelling">Date: Fri=2C 27 Sep 2013 16:08:09 +0200<br>From: Stefan.Schaefer@i=
up.uni-heidelberg.de<br>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org<br>Subject: LF: QR=
SS OP WSPR<br><br>=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
  =0A=
=0A=
=0A=
Bob=2C <br>=0A=
<br>=0A=
For QRSS reception on 4000m=2C better ask G4WGT or F5WK or F6CNI for a=0A=
preferred frequency. Ort maybe TF3HZ? He is reading the reflector as=0A=
well. At least i saw the flag from Iceland on the flagcounter of=0A=
SC8CS's new grabber which was announced here :-))<br>=0A=
<br>=0A=
BTW=2C regarding OP65=2C Jay/W1VD recently did some tests comparing OP4 and=
=0A=
WSPR-2. The summary was something like "WSPR-2 is as "sensitive" as=0A=
OP8" !!. Correct me Jay. That means=2C instead transmitting OP65=2C you=0A=
could use WSPR-15 instead and may have 4 times higher probabbility to=0A=
get a decode=2C e.g. if there is just a short propagation window like on=0A=
137 kHz.<br>=0A=
<br>=0A=
73=2C Stefan<br>=0A=
<br>=0A=
Am 27.09.2013 15:55=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A=
<blockquote cite=3D"mid:BLU180-W95E6C2B7338DA819CBCCE7AC290@phx.gbl">=0A=
  <style><!--=0A=
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P {=0A=
padding:0px=3B=0A=
}=0A=
=0A=
.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage {=0A=
font-size:12pt=3B=0A=
font-family:Calibri=3B=0A=
}=0A=
=0A=
--></style>=0A=
  <div dir=3D"ltr">Stefan=3B<br>=0A=
It is same here.&nbsp=3B But you can't do everything-transmit and receive a=
t=0A=
same time no go.&nbsp=3B <br>=0A=
I have a similar PC got from neighbor last season a Samsung&nbsp=3Bless tha=
n=0A=
two years old.&nbsp=3B Big difference from little ACER PC!<br>=0A=
I think I am going to stick with QRSS 60 for anymore 73&nbsp=3BkHz work.&nb=
sp=3B What=0A=
freq might be best for UK/Euro work?&nbsp=3B I understand that 72.4 is not=
=0A=
good in UK/Europe.&nbsp=3B Seems that 74.5-74.6 seems best from comments I =
am=0A=
getting?<br>=0A=
Any suggestions appreciated-Bob<br>=0A=
&nbsp=3B<br>=0A=
  </div>=0A=
</blockquote></div> 		 	   		  </div></body>
</html>=

--_fe32c7d6-e17f-4c75-a118-90c2acac11fe_--