Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.93.2 with SMTP id cq2csp49954igb; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 15:39:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.205.15.72 with SMTP id pt8mr11454099bkb.17.1378679970399; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 15:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id zb6si927593bkb.75.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 15:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VIncZ-0005Zy-JN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 23:38:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VIncZ-0005Zp-2I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 23:38:19 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s35.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.46]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VIncX-0004Us-Av for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 23:38:17 +0100 Received: from BLU177-DS17 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s35.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 8 Sep 2013 15:38:15 -0700 X-TMN: [ohJ0jHkyKCDquFwJJAprbY1PMhnfJbh6] X-Originating-Email: [hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Laurence KL7 L To: References: <522CB1ED.3080603@aol.com> <903E120C9B9747489DF5329EEC0657B4@AGB> <522CECAC.2050508@aol.com> <522CEF44.10402@aol.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 22:38:14 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3508.1109 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3508.1109 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2013 22:38:15.0065 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B499090:01CEACE4] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: It appears when G4CFY writes he attracts a lot of comments/technical critiques' on his views ( I looked at a back copy). Still as we know from this forum lively debate is something that isnt lacking at times and is very healthy (cough..) - I just cant stand the pooh poohing of the band as even with backyard tx loops the results can be illuminating (and not just the kitchen flouri tubes either) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.46 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hellozerohellozero[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: LF: Re: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 887 It appears when G4CFY writes he attracts a lot of comments/technical critiques' on his views ( I looked at a back copy). Still as we know from this forum lively debate is something that isnt lacking at times and is very healthy (cough..) - I just cant stand the pooh poohing of the band as even with backyard tx loops the results can be illuminating (and not just the kitchen flouri tubes either) He should be pointed to the YXM, 6RU XBM XDV and others for what has been achieved and possible. 600 mile ground wave CW audible signal levels from a mobile rx set up isnt useless in my view. But there again Im highly biased :-) into Class AA... ps Likely Ill be in the UK in Oct and mobile rx on 137/500 Laurence KL7 L et al Rainy Alaska with snow on the hills