Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp81043pad; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:18:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.73.65 with SMTP id j1mr11199507wiv.10.1380489519398; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id df5si3353711wib.68.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@juno.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VQOBB-0002H5-TM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:05:25 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VQOBB-0002Gu-Ec for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:05:25 +0100 Received: from outbound-mail02.vgs.untd.com ([64.136.55.36]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VQOB9-0007hw-8C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:05:24 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=juno.com Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juno.com; s=alpha; t=1380488719; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; l=0; h=To:Date:Subject:Content-Type:From:Message-Id; b=Wx2NZ+WWlF6bhkp6wl52fJUKAOkSAfnGyBSwVo37YCOhYrAUnCgyzjTesOgxmh73r sc+Xd3cC8QRVCFKHn9rfcN8rC0zktEWkL9M/VlXA0QeqAbbm1p3GhwTP956ju1MqjW YSrVlWIovH8A8AdZ+49yZ+WeR2MVDC1xiHUQ8nMg= Received: from outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com (mailpop05.vgs.untd.com [10.181.45.25]) by smtpout02.vgs.untd.com with SMTP id AABKETFQXAAP4BSJ for (sender ); Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:04:21 -0700 (PDT) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:03:46 -0400 X-Mailer: Email Client 8.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 7-6,7,9-13,15-35,37-41,42-32767 X-Originating-IP: 71.173.141.82 From: Message-Id: X-UNTD-BodySize: 3334 X-ContentStamp: 7:3:3317606382 X-MAIL-INFO:40b8f9ad71f859184838f8f9c94d1c4d48688929c1095db1a9f559cc781c0915ccb819a1eca16c55556dd8fcbd2d7c4c0065116d450065214c6d01390cd98d4c9de96cbded7539a53c3599f93d28bcd1add5cd283575f5d9ad1128dc25384895 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: yokUgcxCbtTP7XLrpefewFNjvlzyBxWKf6ENLAd9TsLnhThAhCeMHw== X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.181.45.25|mailpop05.vgs.untd.com|outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com|riese-k3djc@juno.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hook up the meter and note the position of the needle on the meter then reverse the input/output,,, after readjusting the meter should show the same spot ,,, good test for any swr meter Bob K3DJC On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:43:27 -0400 Bob Raide writes: Stefan; I have had great results using even an old Heath-kit SWR meter! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [64.136.55.36 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (riese-k3djc[at]juno.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: ead411ce91f9601ce3974c7575797436 Subject: Re: LF: HF SWR meters on MF? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=--__JNP_000_414e.4487.5382 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_JUNO_RCVD,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2362 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ----__JNP_000_414e.4487.5382 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hook up the meter and note the position of the needle on the meter then reverse the input/output,,, after readjusting the meter should show the same spot ,,, good test for any swr meter Bob K3DJC On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:43:27 -0400 Bob Raide writes: Stefan; I have had great results using even an old Heath-kit SWR meter! > Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:34:52 +0200 > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: HF SWR meters on MF? > > Hi MF, > > Did someone try to use a normal HF SWR meter on 630m? They are > specificated down to 1800 kHz of course but what about 472 kHz? > > At least it would be good to get some indication that: > > -There is some output power (e.g. when using an IC706) > -One is coming closer to resonance > -Impedance is/comes close to 50 Ohm > > I'm supporting a new potential MF RX station with limited equipment (no > oscilloscope...)... > > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > ----__JNP_000_414e.4487.5382 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hook up the meter and note the position of the needle on the meter
then reverse the input/output,,, after readjusting the meter should = show=20 the same
spot ,,, good test for any swr meter
 
Bob K3DJC
 
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:43:27 -0400 Bob Raide <rjraide@hotmail.com> writes:
Stefan;
I have had great results using even an old = Heath-kit=20 SWR meter!
 
> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:34:52 +0200
> From:=20 Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
> To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: HF SWR meters on MF?>=20
> Hi MF,
>
> Did someone try to use a normal HF SWR = meter=20 on 630m? They are
> specificated down to 1800 kHz of course but = what=20 about 472 kHz?
>
> At least it would be good to get some=20 indication that:
>
> -There is some output power (e.g. when = using=20 an IC706)
> -One is coming closer to resonance
> -Impedance=20 is/comes close to 50 Ohm
>
> I'm supporting a new potential = MF RX=20 station with limited equipment (no
> oscilloscope...)...
>=20
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
 
----__JNP_000_414e.4487.5382--