Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.93.2 with SMTP id cq2csp43198igb; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:02:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.188.49 with SMTP id fx17mr5688697wic.49.1378663354012; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 11:02:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cw7si3128759wjc.165.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 11:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VIina-0003xd-S3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:29:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VIina-0003xU-FR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:29:22 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VIinY-0003R5-KK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:29:21 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.27.189.172]) by mwinf5d20 with ME id NhVG1m00B3jd0fW03hVGp0; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 19:29:17 +0200 Message-ID: <903E120C9B9747489DF5329EEC0657B4@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <522CB1ED.3080603@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <522CB1ED.3080603@aol.com> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 18:29:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: And those who go a little more , Cams' comic so im reliably informed [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2341 And those who go a little more , Cams' comic so im reliably informed G, But , what actually is he talking about in the article ? -------------------------------------------------- From: "pat" Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 6:20 PM To: Cc: "Warren Ziegler" Subject: Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band > Warren, > While many of us (particularly those of us of a certain age) have an > affection stretching back to near childhood for that publication it is > not for nothing that we nickname it "Practically Witless Monthly" :>) > > 73 > > > On 08/09/13 02:53, Warren Ziegler wrote: >> >> Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his "Practical Wireless" column >> "Technical for the terrified" this month on the 137 kHz band in which >> he writes it off as worthless. >> >> "With the limitation of antenna efficiency together with a bandwidth >> of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be done with this band." >> >> Anyone on the list know Tony? >> Who is in the best position to write a rebuttal that PW will publish? >> >> >> -- >> 73 Warren K2ORS >> WD2XGJ >> WD2XSH/23 >> WE2XEB/2 >> WE2XGR/1 >> > > > -- > 73 de pat g4gvw > es gd dx > qth nr Felixstowe > East Coast UK > >