Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.93.2 with SMTP id cq2csp68234igb; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 03:47:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.10.136 with SMTP id i8mr856358wib.46.1378896448502; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 03:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w11si4543876wib.45.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 03:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VJhJV-0004G9-U2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:06:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VJhJV-0004G0-DZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:06:21 +0100 Received: from omr-m06.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.80]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VJhJT-0000DU-5V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:06:20 +0100 Received: from mtaomg-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.13]) by omr-m06.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 2F9F8700000A6 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:06:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-dfd004c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dfd004.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.55.79]) by mtaomg-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 0BA6BE000085 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:06:16 -0400 (EDT) References: <8D07CECD877DF10-16C4-74C@webmail-m212.sysops.aol.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <8D07CECD877DF10-16C4-74C@webmail-m212.sysops.aol.com> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Markus Vester X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: Webmail 38041-BASIC Received: from 194.138.39.60 by webmail-m212.sysops.aol.com (64.12.75.237) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:06:15 -0400 Message-Id: <8D07CEDAFCE2EF1-16C4-7AA@webmail-m212.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [194.138.39.60] Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:06:15 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1378893976; bh=1VQZkNDMxuayvJFUPi2jl6YFmDOlBCWxF5TADKYUqLU=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Q6y8Juo5qrH5FefQgwKFyC9q7pnu/6ifh+iJeSaA1/AT9yWGi3DafCVmI9gMSNxUw HUpS52Bms2rcoa57JdpRMI2zWSi25aK1E2FTZlexfG2mbilok8kcn7mL3e3DzZVnmU ZCdRCBFPTb3ybTQJT3WiF02MdsZYKL552vk/Q73o= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d290d523040984ab0 X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Edgar,  straightforward linear addition of voltages. If both transmitters had same power and phase you will get + 6 dB on the receiver.  If you had two equally (in)efficient LF antennas on the same premises (ie. within a wavelength) and drove both equally, you'd need double TX power in total but achieve four times ERP. This is equivalent to a larger antenna with double efficiency.  The trick won't work that way at HF or VHF, where antennas are alraedy nearly 100% efficient, and mutual resistance will increase the required input power for one antenna when the other is activated. Then inducing directivity is the only way to increase gain. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [64.12.143.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: cd79e98bb57cf38a756c15469b5a993e Subject: Re: LF: Radio signals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D07CEDAFD7B481_16C4_1737_webmail-m212.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2707 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8D07CEDAFD7B481_16C4_1737_webmail-m212.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Edgar, =C2=A0 straightforward linear addition of voltages. If both transmitters had same = power and phase you will get + 6 dB on the receiver. =C2=A0 If you had two equally (in)efficient LF antennas on the same premises (ie. = within a wavelength) and=C2=A0drove both=C2=A0equally,=C2=A0you'd need doub= le TX power in total but achieve four times ERP.=C2=A0This is equivalent to= a larger antenna with double efficiency.=20 =C2=A0 The trick won't work that way at HF or VHF, where antennas are alraedy near= ly 100% efficient, and mutual=C2=A0resistance will increase the required in= put power for one antenna when the other is activated.=C2=A0Then=C2=A0induc= ing directivity is the only way to increase gain. =C2=A0 Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) =C2=A0 =C2=A0 -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: edgar <edgarjtwining@virginbroadband.com.au> An: 600m <600m@yahoogroups.com>; rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blac= ksheep.org> Verschickt: Mi, 11 Sept 2013 7:05 am Betreff: LF: Radio signals Hi Group,=20 =20 What is the mechanism for the way radio signals combine in the air?=20 =20 For example=20 =20 1.There are two transmitters each sending out the same fixed frequency =20 sine wave signal.=20 =20 2. There are no other signals in space, and no background noise.=20 =20 3. There are no propagation factors modifying the signals.=20 =20 e.g. buildings, ionosphere layers.=20 =20 4. Both transmitters are the same distance from the receiver.=20 =20 5. Both signals have the same polarisation.=20 =20 How have the signals combined when they reach a receiving antenna at a =20 reasonable distance from both transmitters?=20 =20 It the process addition, multiplication or some other process?=20 =20 Regards, Edgar=20 Moonah, Tasmania.=20 =20 =20 =20 ----------MB_8D07CEDAFD7B481_16C4_1737_webmail-m212.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Edgar,
 
straightforward linear addition of voltages. = If both transmitters had same power and phase you will get + 6 dB on the re= ceiver.
 
If you had= two equally (in)efficient LF antennas  
The trick = won't work that way at HF or VHF, where antennas are alraedy nearly 100% ef= ficient, and mutual resistance will increase the required input power = for one antenna when the other is activated. Then inducing direct= ivity is the only way to increase gain.

 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
 
-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: edgar <edga= rjtwining@virginbroadband.com.au>
An: 600m <600m@yahoogroups.com>; rsgb_lf_group <r= sgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mi, 11 Sept 2013 7:05 am
Betreff: LF: Radio signals




Hi Group, 

What is the mechanism for the way radio signals combine in the air?

For example

1.There are two transmitters each sending out the same fixed frequency sine wave signal.

2. There are no other signals in space, and no background noise.

3. There are no propagation factors modifying the signals.

e.g. buildings, ionosphere layers.

4. Both transmitters are the same distance from the receiver.

5. Both signals have the same polarisation.

How have the signals combined when they reach a receiving antenna at a reasonable distance from both transmitters?

It the process addition, multiplication or some other process?

Regards, Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.


----------MB_8D07CEDAFD7B481_16C4_1737_webmail-m212.sysops.aol.com--