Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp74382pad; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:20:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.12.243 with SMTP id b19mr10626327wic.18.1380478855839; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jw4si6804636wjc.123.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VQLSB-0007wb-DJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:10:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VQLSA-0007wS-WA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:10:46 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VQLS9-0006G1-4i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:10:45 +0100 Received: from Clemens0811 ([91.57.89.49]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MUI8w-1VHzja03cY-00R4mg for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:10:44 +0200 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <524864BC.60908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <524864BC.60908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:10:47 +0200 Message-ID: <76F7F78CD13D4C24A8BA85B9C204532A@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 Thread-Index: Ac69OlfaKJ7cQSTmT9OF63zlo4nTVQAAZy0g X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8S6AIFIma6WHPL54hzMDJ3wEb0Ee5xtgQJ9zgxNBAXTTQYoWkKB Bmy4BBX1udo6rpugaQPzJCP+NwZrKEFlgaRocd2KiadctS+Vpw30kRzrEptrW1SCpFENEBV aXCWPhJEzLHDF3XchbQGeON/XZIghzfYKavAaJkyx63ilT/gCrtwuHHKJJmNlaFroJn4oKx Dgw8iFkudxBlFtoxZQsVg== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >Did someone try to use a normal HF SWR meter on 630m? They are >specificated down to 1800 kHz of course but what about 472 kHz? I'm using a LP100A vector wattmeter http://www.telepostinc.com/lp100.html with dual coupler option Beside the standard coupler I have the RF sensor LPC6 (.1-20MHz ,1KW) which is not listed on the web page but available on request (the power rating is quite conservative :-). Not a cheap solution but well worth its price. But read yourself the long features list. BTW It shows nicely the power overshoot of the IC-706 on 475kHz at low power, e.g. when you set it to say 2,7W the transmission starts with around 3,5W so one has to take care not to overdrive the PA and shoot the FETs. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: LF: RE: HF SWR meters on MF? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 753 >Did someone try to use a normal HF SWR meter on 630m? They are=20 >specificated down to 1800 kHz of course but what about 472 kHz? I'm using a LP100A vector wattmeter http://www.telepostinc.com/lp100.html with dual coupler option Beside the standard coupler I have=20 the RF sensor LPC6 (.1-20MHz ,1KW) which is not listed on the web page but available on request (the power rating is quite conservative :-).=20 Not a cheap solution but well worth its price. But read yourself the long features list. BTW It shows nicely the power overshoot of the IC-706 on 475kHz at low power, e.g. when you set it to say 2,7W the transmission starts = with around 3,5W so one has to take care not to overdrive the PA and shoot = the FETs. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ=20 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer >Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 7:35 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: LF: HF SWR meters on MF? >