Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp74386pad; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:21:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.122.99 with SMTP id lr3mr13840647wjb.21.1380478859473; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id aw5si6798117wjc.152.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@btinternet.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VQLRs-0007wO-W3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:10:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VQLRs-0007wF-He for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:10:28 +0100 Received: from smtpout10.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.130]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VQLRp-0006Fo-T6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:10:27 +0100 Received: from gnat (81.157.1.66) by smtpout10.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.09) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 5245C3F10020B068 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:10:24 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1380478225; bh=fG4HmbRUVDT/vlNzktd2iSzgXnh7ArTWKY9XjnYP3hQ=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mjsxDy/TPfCgR1+uuKCdE4UD/hrerbXz+O0sfgYkLrj7wqhFlyKgAA7jXwAFSr101xkLyEnszmIgeeAMkc5qDH8TdAbAJgPjHBNRwALS7NXVz4A6BAI1RrlI5KnZ8YbLov7in8DhOhaI2B2KOAwi5kDkyVEUEjPH4Rh42TeWrc4= Message-ID: <6C620201432A459BBD435B0ADFA16DD3@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <524864BC.60908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:02:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130929-0, 29/09/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: er ......an SWR "meter" will tell you nothing about resonance :-)) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 6:34 PM Subject: LF: HF SWR meters on MF? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: LF: Re: HF SWR meters on MF? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 891 er ......an SWR "meter" will tell you nothing about resonance :-)) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" To: Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 6:34 PM Subject: LF: HF SWR meters on MF? > Hi MF, > > Did someone try to use a normal HF SWR meter on 630m? They are=20 > specificated down to 1800 kHz of course but what about 472 kHz? > > At least it would be good to get some indication that: > > -There is some output power (e.g. when using an IC706) > -One is coming closer to resonance > -Impedance is/comes close to 50 Ohm > > I'm supporting a new potential MF RX station with limited equipment (no= =20 > oscilloscope...)... > > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20