Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp171153pad; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:44:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.108.199 with SMTP id hm7mr199430wib.31.1379443452302; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z6si2159504wij.61.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@btinternet.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VLzk7-00028j-Gs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:11:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VLzk7-00028a-2E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:11:19 +0100 Received: from nm8-vm6.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([212.82.99.223]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VLzk4-0002xy-If for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:11:17 +0100 Received: from [212.82.98.43] by nm8.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Sep 2013 18:11:15 -0000 Received: from [77.238.189.20] by tm4.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Sep 2013 18:11:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp815.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Sep 2013 18:11:15 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1379441475; bh=t9OdHYjje+l++zuRUZLR1iRAq5qYkVGfOBXEmwq3sds=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=nZDoUAwW8fNkV3PHlNFrWbK8hkIwgj3kO+FKSPCsyzQoGZf0Dxqj5LO/pCkGGePW8AvZANwgtS6xIESF3pSYtsr0SaUuY4vApkRKzPElbrd9ZVHm4u37tvb4U3a64AGVbIFYEEG6r5ky8srUitSuBGXQe/lDQGaYxcuCpLcsqN4= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 378934.52242.bm@smtp815.mail.ird.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: pLZgY6QVM1m_FJWe.MSKC6Ds7beBv6tdzFDfTnCEJQ.zqRS EOk4muPZOZumuTQAMdZFmizl0qHN5DlWYgbppZIbYEii8yVwX4JEIEqD41p2 S_qlQO8FS7_LoN5lJxiV_RdhN5_sFNIA7GV726OsnsTEVuB.r0yRf6KaN1Ql O8CQPpmpzegdPmT5.D1N5f6eLBMOvkBy6in662IYXEvej.V.gpKCopyy2Y_D kK9UdSzgfhn8VsMMiE4.W9OPfo7bEoyo4Rsic3dZB3fzgOUoP9Loqh8hPok2 Cx4utLOYjbA9XF34ihpksG4L1WLNb6Cd1zRRRlnYup2Hg3FECq231WCc8f8r gZrXtqkYBeUVreDAxPP41L7AXqNnxvlcX46GeYZ324cR7tXaeD_hGWOQPo7m 7Kq3Z_8UjgHhyxZj2PTt0kDAOh9bOFlDA3aFJoE72puhoDOM73pMouJOu2_s H8OMSQozeoCdCZreQUkP_AuP6U3gmO1TgG.EY_9VvL_AUKYnKZNKSCpzE4JB jwclU_VauJXo1okGnrF3Idt_GdRjMEI8ODj8g0dKsF8Y- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-Rocket-Received: from gnat (alan.melia@109.148.134.103 with login) by smtp815.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2013 18:11:15 +0000 GMT Message-ID: <6030704922304BD588E35DBE04A4A67B@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: ,<52382790.28537.19AC27A@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:11:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130917-0, 17/09/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Laurence, thaksor your observations. It does not seem to absorpyion by precipitated electrons. However the solar X-ray flux has been very quiet for some time now(which is a bit odd) I wonder if we are suffering ionospheric leakage at least on your path. That is where not all th signal is refracted but a considerble portion goes right through the E layer out into space?? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.99.223 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 24b65a258fa7a3a87cfdaa03bb2f3176 Subject: Re: LF: Over the Pole and far far away Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A8_01CEB3D9.ACBA78E0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2566 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01CEB3D9.ACBA78E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Laurence, thaksor your observations. It does not seem to absorpyion = by precipitated electrons. However the solar X-ray flux has been very = quiet for some time now(which is a bit odd) I wonder if we are = suffering ionospheric leakage at least on your path. That is where not = all th signal is refracted but a considerble portion goes right through = the E layer out into space?? If that is the case what we might need is a minor geeomag storm to beef = up the electron density again. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Laurence KL7 L=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:43 PM Subject: RE: LF: Over the Pole and far far away Thanks Mike - not a peep from it so some ways to go...no trace even at = dot 60 Laurence KL7L > From: mike.dennison@ntlworld.com > >=20 > It's certainly still blasting away Laurence. >=20 > MIke, G3XDV > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01CEB3D9.ACBA78E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Laurence, thaksor your observations. = It does not=20 seem to absorpyion by precipitated electrons. However the solar X-ray = flux has=20 been very quiet for some time now(which is a bit odd)  I wonder if = we are=20 suffering ionospheric leakage at least on your path. That is = where not all=20 th signal is refracted but a considerble portion goes right through the = E layer=20 out into space??
 
If that is the case what we might need = is a minor=20 geeomag storm to beef up the electron density again.
 
Alan G3NYK
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Laurence KL7 L =
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, = 2013 6:43=20 PM
Subject: RE: LF: Over the Pole = and far=20 far away

Thanks Mike - not a peep from it so some ways to = go...no trace=20 even at dot 60

Laurence KL7L

> From: mike.dennison@ntlworld.com=
>
>=20
> It's certainly still blasting away Laurence.
>
> = MIke,=20 G3XDV
> = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01CEB3D9.ACBA78E0--