Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp80455pad; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:03:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.14.29.67 with SMTP id h43mr31590693eea.7.1380488607566; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t9si14893892eeo.155.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VQO8L-0002Ar-A6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:02:29 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VQO8K-0002Ai-Rz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:02:28 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VQO8J-0007fb-5P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:02:27 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8TL2QgZ001343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:02:26 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r8TL2QDn017269 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:02:26 +0200 Message-ID: <5248955C.3000704@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:02:20 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8A944AD5BB384A088D0F389A9C8F5636@White> <5D7A76C0D1604FC2A0943BC40EA472E4@AGB> In-Reply-To: <5D7A76C0D1604FC2A0943BC40EA472E4@AGB> X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Funny, i think we can continue with this discussion endlessly :-)) A running gag. Am 29.09.2013 22:45, schrieb Graham: > wspr uses 4 carriers , so not suitable Not suitable for what? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ab7de7439a3fce0b74220375dc6f18e8 Subject: Re: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010706000709090103030707" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1963 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010706000709090103030707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Funny, i think we can continue with this discussion endlessly :-)) A running gag. Am 29.09.2013 22:45, schrieb Graham: > wspr uses 4 carriers , so not suitable Not suitable for what? 73, Stefan Am 29.09.2013 22:45, schrieb Graham: > There is only 'one' Opera ! there is no other single carrier > on/off data system > Yes , Markus has designed a secondary detector that acts as > a pattern recognition system , for best results , the qrg > needs to be as stable as possible , wspr uses 4 carriers , > so not suitable and conventional qrss has a limited number > of transitions > Opera sends 256 bits in each tx cycle , which can be > detected earlier than the main decoder , that is extracting the > call from the received data as opposed to pattern matching > , 'a software bombe' > Using the long Op coded tx signal , now , gives a 3 way > split , the 65 min tx time produces quite a sizeable block of > data to post-process > 1... Normal decode with Op software ------round -43 dB > 2...qrss grabber trace as line on qrg...... ?? > 3... correlation detection ....... -50 dB ?? > With the advantage of 50% duty cycle .. > 73-G, > --------------010706000709090103030707 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Funny, i think we can continue with this discussion endlessly :-))
A running gag.

Am 29.09.2013 22:45, schrieb Graham:
wspr  uses   4 carriers  , so  not suitable

Not suitable for what?

73, Stefan



Am 29.09.2013 22:45, schrieb Graham:
There is only   'one'  Opera  ! there  is  no  other  single  carrier  on/off  data  system
 
Yes  , Markus  has  designed  a  secondary detector  that  acts  as  a  pattern  recognition  system , for  best  results  , the  qrg  needs  to  be  as  stable as  possible  , wspr  uses   4 carriers  , so  not suitable  and  conventional  qrss   has a  limited  number  of  transitions 
 
 Opera  sends  256  bits  in each  tx  cycle  , which  can be  detected  earlier  than the  main decoder  , that  is  extracting  the    call  from the  received  data   as opposed  to  pattern  matching  , 'a  software  bombe'
 
Using  the  long  Op coded tx  signal  , now ,   gives  a  3  way  split , the  65 min tx  time  produces  quite a  sizeable  block of  data  to  post-process
 
1... Normal   decode  with  Op software ------round  -43 dB 
2...qrss   grabber  trace  as  line  on qrg...... ??
3... correlation detection  .......  -50 dB ??
 
With the  advantage  of 50% duty cycle  ..
 
73-G,

--------------010706000709090103030707--