Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <52485B7C.3000708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:55:24 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <5247E37F.7080300@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <5247E37F.7080300@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: LF: 74550 XRS in Germany
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------030604000209050806090304"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030604000209050806090304
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello Bob and Hartmut,

My congratulation for that success. Both of you must have a very 
suitable system to radiate respectively receive a signal on the 4000m band!

Bob, can you transmit DFCW? If 4000m behaves reasonable like 2200m, 
then* DFCW-180* should be a good choice! It is a bit slower and may 
allow reception of your signal even for station with lower RX 
sensitivity than Hartmut offers. Also DFCW gives you a better ID since 
the frequency shift is another indicator which separates your signal 
from random QRM...

73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 29.09.2013 10:23, schrieb Hartmut Wolff:
> Bob,
>
> the capture is a bit tiny, because I used a qrss 120 screen. Your 
> signal was drifting and you crossed the Loran line just before 04:00. 
> For the future a frequency 1 Hz lower would be better.
>
> 73
>
> Hartmut

--------------030604000209050806090304
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hello Bob and Hartmut, <br>
<br>
My congratulation for that success. Both of you must have a very
suitable system to radiate respectively receive a signal on the 4000m
band! <br>
<br>
Bob, can you transmit DFCW? If 4000m behaves reasonable like 2200m, then<b>
DFCW-180</b> should be a good choice! It is a bit slower and may allow
reception of your signal even for station with lower RX sensitivity
than Hartmut offers. Also DFCW gives you a better ID since the
frequency shift is another indicator which separates your signal from
random QRM...<br>
<br>
73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 29.09.2013 10:23, schrieb Hartmut Wolff:
<blockquote cite="mid:5247E37F.7080300@gmx.de" type="cite">Bob,
  <br>
  <br>
the capture is a bit tiny, because I used a qrss 120 screen. Your
signal was drifting and you crossed the Loran line just before 04:00.
For the future a frequency 1 Hz lower would be better.
  <br>
  <br>
73
  <br>
  <br>
Hartmut
  <br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------030604000209050806090304--