Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp50355pad; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 03:12:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.200.100 with SMTP id jr4mr958960wjc.37.1380449525145; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 03:12:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e9si6174721wjb.156.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 03:12:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VQDXS-0004OI-4q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:43:42 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VQDXR-0004O9-Ge for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:43:41 +0100 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([195.4.92.90]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VQDXP-0002pL-FO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:43:40 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1VQDXN-0007Hi-Eu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:43:37 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1]:33692 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1VQDXN-00061l-3A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:43:37 +0200 Received: from mx2.freenet.de ([195.4.92.12]:47573) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1VQDUY-0004SH-Rz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:40:42 +0200 Received: from blfd-4db022c5.pool.mediaways.net ([77.176.34.197]:3216 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mx2.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1VQDUY-0001ra-FM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:40:42 +0200 Message-ID: <5247F59D.7030702@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:40:45 +0200 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <23ht99dnd852tktkm8dwyomi.1380368630043@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <23ht99dnd852tktkm8dwyomi.1380368630043@email.android.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pleasant to the ears of some maybe, and very annoying to the neighbours. Please, if you have the choice, do NOT use hard-keying whereever possible. 73, Wolf (who thought about returning to MF... up to now..) [...] Content analysis details: (0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.90 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: Re: LF: Soft keying... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2975 Pleasant to the ears of some maybe, and very annoying to the neighbours. Please, if you have the choice, do NOT use hard-keying whereever possible. 73, Wolf (who thought about returning to MF... up to now..) Am 28.09.2013 13:43, schrieb C. Groeger: > BTW, Stefan, > under difficult conds with low signal strength (which is the case on 630 m) hard keying greatly enhances readability of your CW ! > > And if you like QRQ, hard keyed CW is really essential for good copy! > You can check that easily on Hf, QRQ op's use hard keying... > > 73, df5qg > > > Christian Groeger > > Stefan Schäfer schrieb: > >> Am 27.09.2013 20:51, schrieb Clemens Paul: >>> [...] >>> If you are seriously interested in generating a key click free CW signal,there's an >>> article about that >>> in QST 5/97 and 6/97 dealing with class E amps which would also apply to class D amps. >>> >>> 73 >>> Clemens >>> DL4RAJ >> Yes. >> Or that one: http://www.classeradio.com/classh.htm >> >> I even built something similar some months ago. It is possible to adjust >> the power from 0...> 1 kW with a small potentiometer. Somehow >> fascinating. It was intended to send slow hell on the LF PA, not key >> click free CW. The project is maybe 90% finished but then other projects >> got priority. Image: >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/20130927_211117.jpg You >> can read the names of some ICs :-) >> >> BTW when will your MF PA be finished? >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>