Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp550205pad; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 07:31:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.175.66 with SMTP id by2mr1600474wjc.59.1380292303553; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 07:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id an8si2997919wjc.14.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 07:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VPYiQ-00015e-M5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:08:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VPYiQ-00015V-7o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:08:18 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VPYiN-0006AT-8h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:08:17 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8RE8Ehr013252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:08:14 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r8RE8E4h007821 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:08:14 +0200 Message-ID: <52459149.7070307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:08:09 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5244AB81.8020503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<5245765A.3030301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Bob, For QRSS reception on 4000m, better ask G4WGT or F5WK or F6CNI for a preferred frequency. Ort maybe TF3HZ? He is reading the reflector as well. At least i saw the flag from Iceland on the flagcounter of SC8CS's new grabber which was announced here :-)) [...] Content analysis details: (-3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ebba021850e0a5d4120636e52401e975 Subject: LF: QRSS OP WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050809070108040903020108" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 694 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050809070108040903020108 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob, For QRSS reception on 4000m, better ask G4WGT or F5WK or F6CNI for a preferred frequency. Ort maybe TF3HZ? He is reading the reflector as well. At least i saw the flag from Iceland on the flagcounter of SC8CS's new grabber which was announced here :-)) BTW, regarding OP65, Jay/W1VD recently did some tests comparing OP4 and WSPR-2. The summary was something like "WSPR-2 is as "sensitive" as OP8" !!. Correct me Jay. That means, instead transmitting OP65, you could use WSPR-15 instead and may have 4 times higher probabbility to get a decode, e.g. if there is just a short propagation window like on 137 kHz. 73, Stefan Am 27.09.2013 15:55, schrieb Bob Raide: > Stefan; > It is same here. But you can't do everything-transmit and receive at > same time no go. > I have a similar PC got from neighbor last season a Samsung less than > two years old. Big difference from little ACER PC! > I think I am going to stick with QRSS 60 for anymore 73 kHz work. > What freq might be best for UK/Euro work? I understand that 72.4 is > not good in UK/Europe. Seems that 74.5-74.6 seems best from comments > I am getting? > Any suggestions appreciated-Bob > --------------050809070108040903020108 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob,

For QRSS reception on 4000m, better ask G4WGT or F5WK or F6CNI for a preferred frequency. Ort maybe TF3HZ? He is reading the reflector as well. At least i saw the flag from Iceland on the flagcounter of SC8CS's new grabber which was announced here :-))

BTW, regarding OP65, Jay/W1VD recently did some tests comparing OP4 and WSPR-2. The summary was something like "WSPR-2 is as "sensitive" as OP8" !!. Correct me Jay. That means, instead transmitting OP65, you could use WSPR-15 instead and may have 4 times higher probabbility to get a decode, e.g. if there is just a short propagation window like on 137 kHz.

73, Stefan

Am 27.09.2013 15:55, schrieb Bob Raide:
Stefan;
It is same here.  But you can't do everything-transmit and receive at same time no go. 
I have a similar PC got from neighbor last season a Samsung less than two years old.  Big difference from little ACER PC!
I think I am going to stick with QRSS 60 for anymore 73 kHz work.  What freq might be best for UK/Euro work?  I understand that 72.4 is not good in UK/Europe.  Seems that 74.5-74.6 seems best from comments I am getting?
Any suggestions appreciated-Bob
 
--------------050809070108040903020108--