Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp553534pad; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:12:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.183.180 with SMTP id en20mr3089169wic.18.1380294728200; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gd9si3058531wic.69.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VPWvD-0000Zw-3m for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:13:23 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VPWvC-0000Zn-Di for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:13:22 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VPWvA-0005eN-PS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:13:21 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8RCDJZ4013948 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:13:19 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r8RCDJAX002528 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:13:19 +0200 Message-ID: <5245765A.3030301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:13:14 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5244AB81.8020503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 27.09.2013 01:14, schrieb Bob Raide: > Stefan; > I recall you had an old PC. What did you pick up for your new unit? Bob Hi Bob, It's nothing special, about 5 years old. 2 GHz CPU and 2 GB RAM, 800 MHz RAM clock frequency. But now i can run 7 SpecLab instances + WSPR-15 on LF + WSPR-2 on LF + WSPR-2 on MF PERMANENTLY. The CPU load is still below 25% :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-4.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 0b36c952c26be93e626fe2fa1c93657f Subject: Re: LF: Finally! Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010804090804020002090804" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2328 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010804090804020002090804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 27.09.2013 01:14, schrieb Bob Raide: > Stefan; > I recall you had an old PC. What did you pick up for your new unit? Bob Hi Bob, It's nothing special, about 5 years old. 2 GHz CPU and 2 GB RAM, 800 MHz RAM clock frequency. But now i can run 7 SpecLab instances + WSPR-15 on LF + WSPR-2 on LF + WSPR-2 on MF PERMANENTLY. The CPU load is still below 25% :-) BTW the soundcard is able to run at 192 kS/s, so theoretically i could set up a 0...96 kHz grabber, including your 74 kHz section. However i do not yet have a suitable RX antenna because they all use low pass filters. Furthermore my location is not really superior for LF reception. Thus it is very unlikely that i can see a trace of you here. The UK hams and some of F are certainly in a better situation. That's why i mostly concentrate on the TX side :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------010804090804020002090804 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Am 27.09.2013 01:14, schrieb Bob Raide:
Stefan;
I recall you had an old PC.  What did you pick up for your new unit? Bob

Hi Bob,

It's nothing special, about 5 years old. 2 GHz CPU and 2 GB RAM, 800 MHz RAM clock frequency. But now i can run 7 SpecLab instances + WSPR-15 on LF + WSPR-2 on LF + WSPR-2 on MF PERMANENTLY. The CPU load is still below 25% :-)

BTW the soundcard is able to run at 192 kS/s, so theoretically i could set up a 0...96 kHz grabber, including your 74 kHz section. However i do not yet have a suitable RX antenna because they all use low pass filters. Furthermore my location is not really superior for LF reception. Thus it is very unlikely that i can see a trace of you here. The UK hams and some of F are certainly in a better situation. That's why i mostly concentrate on the TX side :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------010804090804020002090804--