Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp457753pad; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 05:08:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.110.138 with SMTP id ia10mr557658wjb.3.1380197337551; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 05:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sh12si504557wic.84.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 05:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VPA4N-0000s8-9c for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:49:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VPA4M-0000rz-Pv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:49:18 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VPA4K-0004WS-UR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:49:17 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r8QBnFrx000736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:49:15 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r8QBnEfh032433 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:49:15 +0200 Message-ID: <52441F36.4050503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:49:10 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: ,<524213E5.5000509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<8C15231456D14C7EA62378D07C17171D@gnat> ,<5242E350.9090804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<524364A5.90301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 26.09.2013 02:50, schrieb Bob Raide: > Stefan; > If you get time can you show me where the sphericas electrode would be > placed? Maybe at the ant end? Add it where you can see it sparking. You can use more simple arrangements to prevent arcing though. But preferably i recomment to increase the top load capacity of the antenna. This will reduce the voltage and the coil losses. The coil losses could be in the range of 30 to 60 % of your total losses i guess. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 60b21f5b7eb190e65b65540006a87038 Subject: Re: LF: TA CW? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030106000106000303080207" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3001 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030106000106000303080207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 26.09.2013 02:50, schrieb Bob Raide: > Stefan; > If you get time can you show me where the sphericas electrode would be > placed? Maybe at the ant end? Add it where you can see it sparking. You can use more simple arrangements to prevent arcing though. But preferably i recomment to increase the top load capacity of the antenna. This will reduce the voltage and the coil losses. The coil losses could be in the range of 30 to 60 % of your total losses i guess. > I have figured you have 10 db on me on 137! You are in here almost > every night regardless of conditions! That is nice. I hope i can hold this situation as long as possible. But they are building another building in 30m distance of the antenna. This will not improve the situation :-( Sometime everything comes to an end, we know. > I see pictures of your 9 kHz gear and the land is flat and I would bet > your soil conductivity is very good. The 8.97 kHz experiments were done at a different location. This location was excellent, until they installed a 2 MW wind generator there. All experiments were /p, so i had no permanent earth system installed there. I used a long copper plate and a few earth rods on VLF. I a short experiment i transmitted in CW and so i had to add a C of 60000 uF (350V) to the PA, so the generator just sees an average power. There i got 1.7A antenna current on 8.97 kHz in a 300m vertical antenna. The signal was audible in 40 km distance which is more than 1 Lambda. More could have been possible but there were no listeners in that sort of distance. But in DFCW-600 i managed to be visible in 4X, TF, EI, G, F, ON, PA, SP, OE, I, OK and YO. Nice to think back to these times :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------030106000106000303080207 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Am 26.09.2013 02:50, schrieb Bob Raide:
Stefan;
If you get time can you show me where the sphericas electrode would be placed?  Maybe at the ant end?
Add it where you can see it sparking. You can use more simple arrangements to prevent arcing though.
But preferably i recomment to increase the top load capacity of the antenna. This will reduce the voltage and the coil losses. The coil losses could be in the range of 30 to 60 % of your total losses i guess.

I have figured you have 10 db on me on 137!  You are in here almost every night regardless of conditions!
That is nice. I hope i can hold this situation as long as possible. But they are building another building in 30m distance of the antenna. This will not improve the situation :-( Sometime everything comes to an end, we know.

I see pictures of your 9 kHz gear and the land is flat and I would bet your soil conductivity is very good.
The 8.97 kHz experiments were done at a different location. This location was excellent, until they installed a 2 MW wind generator there. All experiments were /p, so i had no permanent earth system installed there. I used a long copper plate and a few earth rods on VLF. I a short experiment i transmitted in CW and so i had to add a C of 60000 uF (350V) to the PA, so the generator just sees an average power. There i got 1.7A antenna current on 8.97 kHz in a 300m vertical antenna. The signal was audible in 40 km distance which is more than 1 Lambda. More could have been possible but there were no listeners in that sort of distance. But in DFCW-600 i managed to be visible in 4X, TF, EI, G, F, ON, PA, SP, OE, I, OK and YO. Nice to think back to these times :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------030106000106000303080207--