Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp420297pad; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:02:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.78.78 with SMTP id z14mr29184164wjw.32.1380150133400; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fw4si15841186wjb.97.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VOxgD-0004kI-Ho for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:35:33 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VOxgC-0004k2-Ns for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:35:32 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VOxgA-0006uf-UM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:35:31 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8PMZUbT012968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:35:30 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r8PMZU6G028426 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:35:30 +0200 Message-ID: <5243652D.1050508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:35:25 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: ,<524213E5.5000509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<8C15231456D14C7EA62378D07C17171D@gnat> ,<5242E350.9090804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524364A5.90301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <524364A5.90301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: PS: The PA is a H bridge, using 4x IRFP460A, switching directly at 320 VDC (230V AC mains voltage here). 73, Stefan Am 26.09.2013 00:33, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > Hi Bob, > > Am 25.09.2013 21:13, schrieb Bob Raide: >> Stefan; >> The voltage is terrible! I can draw a 2.5 inch flame off the ant input. > I know hwat you mean. Similar problems here when i was setting up the > system here is 2011, see > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/20111106-20h02m13s-FF7_8470.jpg > That was not even half the voltage i have to deal with now (a > sphericas electrode solved the problem, > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/Electrode.JPG ). > >> More top loading would be great but also use this ant for 80 and 160 >> meters. > And what is the problem? It is not Lambda/4 for these bands so you > need a matching network anyway, don't you? > >> You are probably using a much bigger ant than what I have here. > No, my antenna is smaller. It is an INV-L, 30m up and 70m long. The > effective height is 25m, about. The wire is 10mm diameter steel wire > (was designed to withstand a direct lightning strike). You see from > the image above that the isolator is quite heavy (takes 60 kN). 50 kV > rms in rain is no problem, however there are other regions where > corona discharges become visible, depending on the temperature and > humidity. What i do is keeping the earth losses extremely low! And i > took RF litz wire with 729 strands for the coil which has a Q of about > 1000. Power levels are rather moderate here, also because i'm running > the TX all the time when sleeping :-) You know, the best results to > the west are achieved at night! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC, TXing WSPR-15 on LF again this night. [...] Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: d63ea50e288c5ecb9bd7a86eeabe94f2 Subject: Re: LF: TA CW? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090804010604090001000007" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090804010604090001000007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id r8PMZUbT012968 PS: The PA is a H bridge, using 4x IRFP460A, switching directly at 320=20 VDC (230V AC mains voltage here). 73, Stefan Am 26.09.2013 00:33, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: > Hi Bob, > > Am 25.09.2013 21:13, schrieb Bob Raide: >> Stefan; >> The voltage is terrible! I can draw a 2.5 inch flame off the ant inpu= t. > I know hwat you mean. Similar problems here when i was setting up the=20 > system here is 2011, see=20 > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/20111106-20h02m13s-FF7_= 8470.jpg=20 > That was not even half the voltage i have to deal with now (a=20 > sphericas electrode solved the problem,=20 > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/Electrode.JPG ). > >> More top loading would be great but also use this ant for 80 and 160=20 >> meters. > And what is the problem? It is not Lambda/4 for these bands so you=20 > need a matching network anyway, don't you? > >> You are probably using a much bigger ant than what I have here. > No, my antenna is smaller. It is an INV-L, 30m up and 70m long. The=20 > effective height is 25m, about. The wire is 10mm diameter steel wire=20 > (was designed to withstand a direct lightning strike). You see from=20 > the image above that the isolator is quite heavy (takes 60 kN). 50 kV=20 > rms in rain is no problem, however there are other regions where=20 > corona discharges become visible, depending on the temperature and=20 > humidity. What i do is keeping the earth losses extremely low! And i=20 > took RF litz wire with 729 strands for the coil which has a Q of about=20 > 1000. Power levels are rather moderate here, also because i'm running=20 > the TX all the time when sleeping :-) You know, the best results to=20 > the west are achieved at night! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC, TXing WSPR-15 on LF again this night. --------------090804010604090001000007 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit PS: The PA is a H bridge, using 4x IRFP460A, switching directly at 320 VDC  (230V AC mains voltage here).

73, Stefan

Am 26.09.2013 00:33, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
Hi Bob,

Am 25.09.2013 21:13, schrieb Bob Raide:
Stefan;
The voltage is terrible!  I can draw a 2.5 inch flame off the ant input.
I know hwat you mean. Similar problems here when i was setting up the system here is 2011, see https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/20111106-20h02m13s-FF7_8470.jpg That was not even half the voltage i have to deal with now (a sphericas electrode solved the problem, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/Electrode.JPG ).

More top loading would be great but also use this ant for 80 and 160 meters.
And what is the problem? It is not Lambda/4 for these bands so you need a matching network anyway, don't you?

You are probably using a much bigger ant than what I have here. 
No, my antenna is smaller. It is an INV-L, 30m up and 70m long. The effective height is 25m, about. The wire is 10mm diameter steel wire (was designed to withstand a direct lightning strike). You see from the image above that the isolator is quite heavy (takes 60 kN). 50 kV rms in rain is no problem, however there are other regions where corona discharges become visible, depending on the temperature and humidity. What i do is keeping the earth losses extremely low! And i took RF litz wire with 729 strands for the coil which has a Q of about 1000. Power levels are rather moderate here, also because i'm running the TX all the time when sleeping :-) You know, the best results to the west are achieved at night!

73, Stefan/DK7FC, TXing WSPR-15 on LF again this night.
--------------090804010604090001000007--