Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp420146pad; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:59:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.93.8 with SMTP id cq8mr24536310wib.38.1380149943405; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sh12si4660989wic.84.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VOxe4-0004jD-GU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:33:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VOxe4-0004j4-14 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:33:20 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VOxe0-0006ty-66 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:33:18 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8PMXFH3011698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:33:15 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r8PMXF2u028355 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:33:15 +0200 Message-ID: <524364A5.90301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:33:09 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: ,<524213E5.5000509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<8C15231456D14C7EA62378D07C17171D@gnat> ,<5242E350.9090804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Bob, Am 25.09.2013 21:13, schrieb Bob Raide: > Stefan; > The voltage is terrible! I can draw a 2.5 inch flame off the ant input. I know hwat you mean. Similar problems here when i was setting up the system here is 2011, see https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/20111106-20h02m13s-FF7_8470.jpg That was not even half the voltage i have to deal with now (a sphericas electrode solved the problem, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/Electrode.JPG ). [...] Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 20fb97b64762a0bd80c12a4b2f6724b0 Subject: Re: LF: TA CW? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040807020706000004080307" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2998 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040807020706000004080307 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Bob, Am 25.09.2013 21:13, schrieb Bob Raide: > Stefan; > The voltage is terrible! I can draw a 2.5 inch flame off the ant input. I know hwat you mean. Similar problems here when i was setting up the system here is 2011, see https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/20111106-20h02m13s-FF7_8470.jpg That was not even half the voltage i have to deal with now (a sphericas electrode solved the problem, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/Electrode.JPG ). > More top loading would be great but also use this ant for 80 and 160 > meters. And what is the problem? It is not Lambda/4 for these bands so you need a matching network anyway, don't you? > You are probably using a much bigger ant than what I have here. No, my antenna is smaller. It is an INV-L, 30m up and 70m long. The effective height is 25m, about. The wire is 10mm diameter steel wire (was designed to withstand a direct lightning strike). You see from the image above that the isolator is quite heavy (takes 60 kN). 50 kV rms in rain is no problem, however there are other regions where corona discharges become visible, depending on the temperature and humidity. What i do is keeping the earth losses extremely low! And i took RF litz wire with 729 strands for the coil which has a Q of about 1000. Power levels are rather moderate here, also because i'm running the TX all the time when sleeping :-) You know, the best results to the west are achieved at night! 73, Stefan/DK7FC, TXing WSPR-15 on LF again this night. --------------040807020706000004080307 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Bob,

Am 25.09.2013 21:13, schrieb Bob Raide:
Stefan;
The voltage is terrible!  I can draw a 2.5 inch flame off the ant input.
I know hwat you mean. Similar problems here when i was setting up the system here is 2011, see https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/20111106-20h02m13s-FF7_8470.jpg That was not even half the voltage i have to deal with now (a sphericas electrode solved the problem, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/Electrode.JPG ).

More top loading would be great but also use this ant for 80 and 160 meters.
And what is the problem? It is not Lambda/4 for these bands so you need a matching network anyway, don't you?

You are probably using a much bigger ant than what I have here. 
No, my antenna is smaller. It is an INV-L, 30m up and 70m long. The effective height is 25m, about. The wire is 10mm diameter steel wire (was designed to withstand a direct lightning strike). You see from the image above that the isolator is quite heavy (takes 60 kN). 50 kV rms in rain is no problem, however there are other regions where corona discharges become visible, depending on the temperature and humidity. What i do is keeping the earth losses extremely low! And i took RF litz wire with 729 strands for the coil which has a Q of about 1000. Power levels are rather moderate here, also because i'm running the TX all the time when sleeping :-) You know, the best results to the west are achieved at night!

73, Stefan/DK7FC, TXing WSPR-15 on LF again this night.
--------------040807020706000004080307--