Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.93.2 with SMTP id cq2csp94854igb; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:35:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.181.12.75 with SMTP id eo11mr4507028wid.24.1379115332519; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r6si2357777wiy.59.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VKcWM-0003jP-Hw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 00:11:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VKcWM-0003jG-4Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 00:11:26 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VKcWJ-0004Eh-Rb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 00:11:25 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r8DNBL2g010608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:11:22 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r8DNBLdC029198 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:11:21 +0200 Message-ID: <52339B94.7030203@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:11:16 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Is it worth to watch it, if it is invisible?? :-) S, Am 14.09.2013 01:02, schrieb Graham: > You-tube ROS-MF2 & 7 > Two clips of Invisible ROS at the the decode limits of -17 > dB and - 24dB s/n > note :: the s/n is average and calibrated against PathSim , > which gives s/n readings > higher ie worse than fldigi / wspr > http://www.moetronix.com/ae4jy/pathsim.htm > G, > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2w1-CBQK1o > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfKKiKRgeLw [...] Content analysis details: (-1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.9 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 0317e2ac8ed27149e57223a21580246d Subject: Re: LF: you-tube ROS-MF2 & 7 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020206090606010401060304" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3447 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020206090606010401060304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is it worth to watch it, if it is invisible?? :-) S, Am 14.09.2013 01:02, schrieb Graham: > You-tube ROS-MF2 & 7 > Two clips of Invisible ROS at the the decode limits of -17 > dB and - 24dB s/n > note :: the s/n is average and calibrated against PathSim , > which gives s/n readings > higher ie worse than fldigi / wspr > http://www.moetronix.com/ae4jy/pathsim.htm > G, > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2w1-CBQK1o > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfKKiKRgeLw --------------020206090606010401060304 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is it worth to watch it, if it is invisible?? :-)

S,

Am 14.09.2013 01:02, schrieb Graham:
 You-tube  ROS-MF2 & 7
 
Two  clips  of  Invisible ROS    at the the  decode  limits  of  -17 dB and  - 24dB s/n
 
 
note ::  the  s/n is   average  and  calibrated  against  PathSim , which  gives  s/n  readings 
higher ie  worse than   fldigi / wspr  http://www.moetronix.com/ae4jy/pathsim.htm
 
G,
 
 
 
--------------020206090606010401060304--