Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <522CB1ED.3080603@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:20:45 +0100
From: pat <g4gvw@aol.com>
Organization: G4GVW
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
CC: Warren Ziegler <wd2xgj@gmail.com>
References: <CAMFjj72EVAUx61a7rZeR41ufXx4z2A2h+UK+DYBj=EPqd0waxg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMFjj72EVAUx61a7rZeR41ufXx4z2A2h+UK+DYBj=EPqd0waxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Warren,
While many of us (particularly those of us of a certain age) have an 
affection stretching back to near childhood for that publication it is 
not for nothing that we nickname it "Practically Witless Monthly" :>)

73


On 08/09/13 02:53, Warren Ziegler wrote:
>
> Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his "Practical Wireless" column 
> "Technical for the terrified" this month on the 137 kHz band in which 
> he writes it off as worthless.
>
> "With the limitation of antenna efficiency together with a bandwidth 
> of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be done with this band."
>
>  Anyone on the list know Tony?
> Who is in the best position to write a rebuttal that PW will publish?
>
>
> -- 
> 73 Warren K2ORS
>                 WD2XGJ
>                 WD2XSH/23
>                 WE2XEB/2
>                 WE2XGR/1
>


-- 
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK