Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp410307pad; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:32:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.178.166 with SMTP id cz6mr3187241wjc.53.1380137576045; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t14si4561915wib.9.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@btinternet.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VOuOP-00048i-07 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:04:57 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VOuOJ-00048Z-EO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:04:51 +0100 Received: from smtpout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.126]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VOuOH-0005Qf-2g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:04:49 +0100 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090201.524333CF.0116,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=46/97,refid=2.7.2:2013.9.25.144221:17:46.879,ip=86.171.166.126,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, MAILTO_TO_RU_TLD, __ANY_URI, RU_TLD, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, SUPERLONG_LINE, __HTML_FONT_GREEN, __HTML_BOLD, __RUS_MAILTO_URL, __HTML_FONT_BLUE, __HTML_FONT_RED, __HAS_HTML, HTML_NO_HTTP, BODY_SIZE_10000_PLUS, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[126.166.171.86.fur], HTML_70_90, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __PHISH_FROM, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from gnat (86.171.166.126) by smtpout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.99.10047) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 524301500002A954 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:04:47 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1380135889; bh=XOv4hCzsrtSOMwUqTSmb18i/npF42eXqyreqPoyzZDU=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer; b=YJO7txliQoCF10aBI9NC94te7/OvAKDe9ZQYnErwgSvhkRKsdXxd77B07g+irZBEvCFaynLPjFN8omExP/PUyALXK7hNiHJ2MZXp0jTTd2ch+VUV8dfrOMNcq97j1ozkQnMlb3lgsunwY5BUNHiAPiJXOfSH35Bnyn9SEWTSf6E= Message-ID: <405CC3B1C7174CF7AAD77C58E924DCAF@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <416ce82c.32a95.14155a63be8.Webtop.44@charter.net> <662F6271FD24456BA298B3FE2680A036@gnat> <492957567.20130925205558@dx.ru> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:52:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130925-0, 25/09/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Alex I should have checked ....the date John quoted was a full year after than that "first", BTW I dont think any of the Canadians active would have heard anything on 73 because CFH has a very active TX right in the middle of what was our allocation. That confirms John must have been 1st NA not just first USA. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 74d0dc719b56550e82bb649ba713486f Subject: Re: Re[2]: LF: TA CW? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001E_01CEBA28.D51EB260" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_60_70, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3460 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CEBA28.D51EB260 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Alex I should have checked ....the date John quoted was a full = year after than that "first", BTW I dont think any of the Canadians = active would have heard anything on 73 because CFH has a very active TX = right in the middle of what was our allocation. That confirms John must = have been 1st NA not just first USA. Some of the data may not be correct, because the first NA station into = Europe was I think Larry VA3LK(??) heard by a Dutch station. I saw the = trace but it was off frequency so I dismissed it, and didnt keep a copy = of the waterfall that was a detection not a full copy.....got full call = the next night I think. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Alex R7NT=20 To: Alan Melia=20 Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 5:55 PM Subject: Re[2]: LF: TA CW? Alan, you wrote 25.09.2013, 19:53 MSK(GMT+4h): > Was that the first E-W reception contact of had Laurie made it = Caanada earlier John?? Alan G3NYK =20 73+136 some firsts 29.12.2004 136kHz First reception of North America signal in Europe on Jason = (Hartmut Wolff in Germany RX John W1TAG's beacon WD2XES) =20 18.12.2002 136kHz First reception of Europe signal in North America on Jason = (John W1TAG RX Jim M0BMU) =20 21.11.2001 73kHz First reception of Europe signal in North America in QRSS = (John W1TAG RX Laurie G3AQC) =20 19.03.2001 136kHz First reception of Europe signal in North America on WOLF = (John W1TAG RX Jim M0BMU) WOLF =20 27.01.2001 136kHz First reception of Europe signal in USA (Dex W4DEX RX = Laurie G3AQC) =20 21.12.2000 136kHz First reception of North America signal in Europe (Peter = G3LDO RX Jack VE1ZZ) =20 10.09.2000 136kHz First reception of Europe signal in North America (John = VE1ZJ RX David G0MRF/p) =20 73! Alex R7NT 136.73.ru ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CEBA28.D51EB260 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Thanks Alex I should have checked = ....the date John=20 quoted was a full year after than that "first", BTW I dont think any of = the=20 Canadians active would have heard anything on 73 because CFH has a = very=20 active TX right in the middle of what was our allocation. That confirms = John=20 must have been 1st NA not just first USA.
 
Some of the data may not be = correct, because=20 the first NA station into Europe was I think  Larry VA3LK(??) heard = by a=20 Dutch station. I saw the trace but it was off frequency so I = dismissed  it,=20 and didnt keep a copy of the waterfall that was a detection not a full=20 copy.....got full call the next night I think.
 
Alan
G3NYK
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Alex R7NT
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, = 2013 5:55=20 PM
Subject: Re[2]: LF: TA = CW?

Alan,


you wrote 25.09.2013, 19:53 MSK(GMT+4h):


>

Was that the first E-W reception contact = of had=20 Laurie made it Caanada earlier John??

Alan

G3NYK

73+136 some firsts

29.12.2004

136kHz First=20 reception of North America signal in Europe on Jason (Hartmut = Wolff in=20 Germany RX John W1TAG's beacon=20 WD2XES)

18.12.2002

136kHz First=20 reception of Europe signal in North America on Jason (John W1TAG = RX Jim=20 M0BMU)

21.11.2001

73kHz First=20 reception of Europe signal in North America in QRSS (John W1TAG = RX=20 Laurie G3AQC)

19.03.2001

136kHz First=20 reception of Europe signal in North America on WOLF (John W1TAG = RX Jim=20 M0BMU) WOLF

27.01.2001

136kHz First=20 reception of Europe signal in USA (Dex W4DEX RX Laurie=20 G3AQC)

21.12.2000

136kHz First=20 reception of North America signal in Europe (Peter G3LDO RX Jack = VE1ZZ)

10.09.2000

136kHz First=20 reception of Europe signal in North America (John VE1ZJ RX David = G0MRF/p)


73! Alex R7NT 136.73.ru

------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CEBA28.D51EB260--