Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp106656pad; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:38:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.204.63.7 with SMTP id z7mr17742850bkh.23.1380530316980; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id oc8si2788356bkb.164.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VQYwN-0007bC-2E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:34:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VQYwM-0007b3-Mc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:34:50 +0100 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VQYwL-0003ip-6i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:34:49 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.31.68.113]) by mwinf5d55 with ME id XLal1m00L2SdeGa03LalrC; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:34:48 +0200 Message-ID: <364341DE3E9B4D84BCD52DE2E383754D@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:34:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I think its the station with the wobbly vfo ? From: "C. Groeger" Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 9:47 AM To: Subject: Re: Aw: LF: HF SWR meters on MF? [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d Subject: Re: Aw: LF: HF SWR meters on MF? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1825 I think its the station with the wobbly vfo ? ________-----__________________----------__________________- -------------------------------------------------- From: "C. Groeger" Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 9:47 AM To: Subject: Re: Aw: LF: HF SWR meters on MF? > You transmit on Lf? > What is your call? > :-) > > Christian Groeger > > LZ schrieb: > >