Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp240386pad; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:59:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.104.42 with SMTP id gb10mr32481772wjb.16.1379519953814; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nj17si4384047wic.81.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VMJnj-0005MK-9Q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:36:23 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VMJni-0005MB-NK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:36:22 +0100 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VMJng-00071Z-89 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:36:21 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.31.70.107]) by mwinf5d64 with ME id SfcG1m0092JsCfW03fcGS2; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:36:19 +0200 Message-ID: <12FD30B2DFA24C5B8D9F376415614152@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <505020E9D2554C49B4B4F7258CFCC3DD@White> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:36:15 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Joe, Looking at the psk-map , Its quite possible , all the monitors where looking for OP8 signals ve7bdq <> we2xpq is also showing as OP8 as well No reason why OP8 should not decode from you , just need to qsy to the OP8 centre qrg 137.650 KHz [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: d7fcd9b75df8d1b09ddef9df028bd9ae Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Op-32 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3229 Joe, Looking at the psk-map , Its quite possible , all the monitors where looking for OP8 signals ve7bdq <> we2xpq is also showing as OP8 as well No reason why OP8 should not decode from you , just need to qsy to the OP8 centre qrg 137.650 KHz 73 -G, -------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 12:33 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Op-32 > Markus, > > Thank-you for the report and your web reception services. Should the > reference oscillator be tweaked a bit? The carrier seems to have drifted > down by a mHz over the past year. > > 73 Joe VO1NA > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, Markus Vester wrote: > >> Joe's Op-32 transmission was detected here consistently last night. No >> decodes on PSK-reporter? >> >> Best 73, >> Markus (DF6NM) >> >> DF6NM JN59NJ Opera-32 correlation >> date time call distance frequency bandwidth snr >> correlation >> 2013-09-18 05:02:00 VO1NA 4585km 137554.999Hz 3mHz -37.7dBOp 77% >> 18.5dB >> 2013-09-18 04:29:04 VO1NA 4585km 137554.999Hz 2mHz -33.3dBOp 99% >> 19.1dB >> 2013-09-18 03:56:08 VO1NA 4585km 137554.999Hz 2mHz -39.6dBOp 90% >> 19.5dB >> 2013-09-18 03:23:12 VO1NA 4585km 137554.999Hz 2mHz -38.6dBOp 100% >> 19.3dB >> 2013-09-18 02:50:15 VO1NA 4585km 137554.999Hz 1mHz -37.5dBOp 100% >> 19.4dB >> 2013-09-18 02:17:21 VO1NA 4585km 137554.999Hz 2mHz -36.7dBOp 92% >> 19.6dB >> 2013-09-18 01:44:25 VO1NA 4585km 137554.999Hz 2mHz -42.6dBOp 100% >> 18.5dB >> 2013-09-18 01:11:30 VO1NA 4585km 137554.999Hz 2mHz -37.9dBOp 100% >> 19.6dB >> 2013-09-18 00:38:36 VO1NA 4585km 137554.999Hz 2mHz -40.2dBOp 97% >> 17.3dB >> 2013-09-18 00:05:39 VO1NA 4585km 137554.999Hz 2mHz -42.3dBOp 97% >> 18.2dB >> > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >