Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.93.2 with SMTP id cq2csp30372igb; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:53:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.96.229 with SMTP id dv5mr7682281wib.51.1377989602701; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pn8si1893591wjb.5.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VFtal-0004wy-Cx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 23:24:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VFtak-0004wp-Lz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 23:24:26 +0100 Received: from qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VFtai-0007Cd-72 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 23:24:25 +0100 Received: from omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.73]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id KaN01m0021ap0As5EaQNyf; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 22:24:22 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id KaQM1m01V0CFS1j3iaQNmc; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 22:24:22 +0000 Message-ID: <003c01cea698$d790e480$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <52210586.6020108@eastlink.ca> <52211DD3.2090607@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <012a01cea5df$cdfaaa50$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <5221F9EB.2010008@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 18:24:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1377987862; bh=FSaZd93nkTb06JfsOtGiretQhZsXi0loRUbKX1Hbi1M=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=PmVGZVTG6OPI1w1Ymj6UwfAnIXMecxgFrhQ/R8eLVZRpVim5tdEJuN0nl8rkID96b 5S6fg7cPyninYp7y+hsPSN63m4YktPlNsRpGd5sgev+hAZyb9pWKR9Mp28XvAFwqF0 0mx6MuBzHdwXxhgAO3X2tLzlw7bGOvBkzQ2DRi09wSbRG9xqIBX3scIx2Zln+oEaqT +6RGpGQXb2/hv7oLHkMAGE3dXB351x3+xafZBoxCfIUaGCKqaTcf0JZt5+ynY6Cw6/ CrxyraffObKi7PxB18kaBP3NmxE3gWuxVKoHnidWIdS0SsAYdq8XZ5biBGyNsSgdeg lQAK87q4SyucA== X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Sorry ... did not store images last night. Copy was quite good early and detiorated as the night went on - due to increased static levels. Will have a look tonight but static is already quite high this afternoon. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 4c0633a540d76adc241b9d3cede72a57 Subject: Re: LF: LF TX??? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2400 Stefan Sorry ... did not store images last night. Copy was quite good early and detiorated as the night went on - due to increased static levels. Will have a look tonight but static is already quite high this afternoon. Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 10:12 AM Subject: Re: LF: LF TX??? Hi Jay, Thanks for watching. What was the best image of last night? The spectrogram has changed again it seems. I will continue this night, same mode. 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: What are the results on 72 kHz so far? Am 31.08.2013 02:19, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > Stefan > > Nice copy so far ... > > http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" > To: > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 6:33 PM > Subject: Re: LF: LF TX??? > > >> Hi Vernon, >> >> I will start to TX DFCW-90 this night on 136.172 kHz again. >> >> Maybe you will catch me? :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> Am 30.08.2013 22:50, schrieb Vernon: >>> Anyone on TX tonight...any mode?? >>> >>> Let me know... >>> >>> Vernon - VE1VDM >> >