Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.33.134 with SMTP id r6csp189193igi; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:20:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.3.201 with SMTP id e9mr1600527lae.24.1375885241682; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 07:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y5si3903588lbb.102.2013.08.07.07.20.40 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 07:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1V74aG-0005Iv-6k for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 15:19:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1V74aF-0005Im-HH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 15:19:27 +0100 Received: from omr-d01.mx.aol.com ([205.188.252.208]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1V74aD-0000fn-ED for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 15:19:26 +0100 Received: from mtaomg-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.199]) by omr-d01.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 65ADF70057A4B for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:19:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-dfe001a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dfe001.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.55.131]) by mtaomg-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id B0E83E000088 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:19:21 -0400 (EDT) References: <8D0618907CE010E-1778-6A7E@webmail-d264.sysops.aol.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <8D0618907CE010E-1778-6A7E@webmail-d264.sysops.aol.com> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Markus Vester X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37953-BASIC Received: from 194.138.39.54 by webmail-d279.sysops.aol.com (205.188.16.108) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 07 Aug 2013 10:19:21 -0400 Message-Id: <8D061903E9F3B4C-8C4-6E59@webmail-d279.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [194.138.39.54] Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:19:21 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1375885162; bh=JnLVcbH4hnwaNIzBjvLopoPV4E3iCec4zvl8iDhF3Fs=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=t7qfuuayn+zend6JbxeQ6+rESuAU8S3XLhPBLBR9nPP2+YxK8PbQwIotOBVp6LsE3 XfqSOgm8G0O2Uok8rsED1hkOnVqk/XWOTJreOSPmHqKD0cvIkvhkpodvD8mdLxu4Yy eX7rCr13FTh5Yox3tE4Mp78rE+Ynz5Yrr8EeUNHE= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33c75202576904e7 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ... rethinking my reply: multiple-hop tweek formation may not be required to explain the bands. Even a simple superposition of groundwave and a single ionospheric reflection will create this type of interference pattern, as long as spherics from a reasonably similar range are involved.  Best 73, Markus [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.252.208 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: ee37f4b261e58bbaf6a18fc5319c092e Subject: Re: LF: VLF strange pattern Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D061903EB70916_8C4_1C06B_webmail-d279.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_AOL_TAGS,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3184 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8D061903EB70916_8C4_1C06B_webmail-d279.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" ... rethinking my reply: multiple-hop tweek formation=C2=A0may not be requi= red to explain the bands. Even=C2=A0a simple superposition of groundwave an= d a single ionospheric reflection=C2=A0will create this type=C2=A0of interf= erence pattern, as long as spherics from a reasonably similar range are inv= olved. =C2=A0 Best 73, Markus =C2=A0 -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com> An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Verschickt: Mi, 7 Aug 2013 3:58 pm Betreff: Re: LF: VLF strange pattern Stefan, the banded spectral structure=C2=A0could be due to=C2=A0multiple bounces be= tween the ionosphere and ground. Under favourable conditions,=C2=A0consecut= ive=C2=A0steeper and steeper reflections can produce a "tweek",=C2=A0ie a= =C2=A0pulsetrain with decreasing repetition rate.=C2=A0During the tail, the= re are distinct spectral maxima about 1.7 kHz apart, defined by the delay f= or near vertical travel=C2=A0to the D-layer and down again. Tweek formation= would be favoured by high-altitude horizontal lightning,=C2=A0good ground = reflectivity (water), and a steep=C2=A0ionization gradient at the bottom of= the ionosphere at night. =C2=A0 As the phasing somewhat depends on the ground distance between the strike a= nd the receiver,=C2=A0patterns from spatially extended storm areas may=C2= =A0average out in a slow spectrogram, unless the lightning=C2=A0activity is= concentrated in a small area or ring around the receiver. Attached is a pl= ot from the Blitzortung archive from 1 to 3 UT.=C2=A0We could speculate tha= t the region of activity=C2=A0in Western France was creating your tweeks an= d the Polish "arc" was responsible for Lubos', but it's hard to tell for su= re. =C2=A0 Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) =C2=A0 =C2=A0 -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Verschickt: Mi, 7 Aug 2013 2:28 pm Betreff: LF: VLF strange pattern VLF,=20 =20 Just discovered a strange QRN pattern on VLF this night. See attachment. = =20 The origin cannot be local because the same was shown on the OK2BVG VLF = =20 grabber.=20 What is it?=20 =20 73, Stefan/DK7FC=20 =20 ----------MB_8D061903EB70916_8C4_1C06B_webmail-d279.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
... rethinking my reply: multiple-hop tweek formatio= n may not be required to explain the bands. Even a simple superpo= sition of groundwave and a single ionospheric reflection will create t= his type of interference pattern, as long as spherics from a reasonabl= y similar range are involved.
 
Best 73,
Markus

 

-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mi, 7 Aug 2013 3:58 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: VLF strange pattern

Stefan,
the banded spectral structure could be due to multiple bounc= es between the ionosphere and ground. Under favourable conditions, con= secutive steeper and steeper reflections can produce a "tweek", i= e a pulsetrain with decreasing repetition rate. During the tail, = there are distinct spectral maxima about 1.7 kHz apart, defined by the dela= y for near vertical travel to the D-layer and down again. Tweek format= ion would be favoured by high-altitude horizontal lightning, good grou= nd reflectivity (water), and a steep ionization gradient at the bottom= of the ionosphere at night.
 
As the phasing somewhat depends on the ground distance between the str= ike and the receiver, patterns from spatially extended storm areas may=  average out in a slow spectrogram, unless the lightning activity= is concentrated in a small area or ring around the receiver. Attached is a= plot from the Blitzortung archive from 1 to 3 UT. We could speculate = that the region of activity in Western France was creating your tweeks= and the Polish "arc" was responsible for Lubos', but it's hard to tell for= sure.
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
 

-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_= lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mi, 7 Aug 2013 2:28 pm
Betreff: LF: VLF strange pattern


VLF, 

Just discovered a strange QRN pattern on VLF this night. See attachment. =
The origin cannot be local because the same was shown on the OK2BVG VLF <= br> grabber.
What is it?

73, Stefan/DK7FC


----------MB_8D061903EB70916_8C4_1C06B_webmail-d279.sysops.aol.com--