Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.33.134 with SMTP id r6csp119136igi; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 05:04:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.235.138 with SMTP id um10mr1789511wjc.30.1376741063116; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 05:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o10si682162wjz.142.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 05:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VAepz-0006Y2-KJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 12:38:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VAepz-0006Xt-6l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 12:38:31 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VAepx-0001T9-Ji for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 12:38:30 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7HBcSI9025898 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:38:28 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r7HBcRDF021686 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:38:27 +0200 Message-ID: <520F60AF.2000004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:38:23 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Lubos, Did you work him last night? I got him arround 22:30 UTC. To that time, the QRN dropped a bit more and the signal came up, maybe 2...3 dB. But he was very weak here, not to talk about 579, rather 329 here. Worked EI0CF, who is more distant, with a solid signal to the same time. So the YUMA seems to be the limiting factor, maybe? Will be there this night again, but it makes no sense before 21 or better 22 UTC i think. [...] Content analysis details: (-5.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 6be9408bcc63ba5aab6f1e66e2d5b7ce Subject: Re: LF: OH1AH Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070908050302040107050008" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2482 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070908050302040107050008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Lubos, Did you work him last night? I got him arround 22:30 UTC. To that time, the QRN dropped a bit more and the signal came up, maybe 2...3 dB. But he was very weak here, not to talk about 579, rather 329 here. Worked EI0CF, who is more distant, with a solid signal to the same time. So the YUMA seems to be the limiting factor, maybe? Will be there this night again, but it makes no sense before 21 or better 22 UTC i think. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 15.08.2013 22:23, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG: > Hello Paul-Henrik, MW! > OH1AH is 569/579 in JN88KS. > > Lubos, OK2BVG --------------070908050302040107050008 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id r7HBcSI9025898 Hello Lubos,

Did you work him last night?

I got him arround 22:30 UTC. To that time, the QRN dropped a bit more and the signal came up, maybe 2...3 dB. But he was very weak here, not to talk about 579, rather 329 here. Worked EI0CF, who is more distant, with a solid signal to the same time. So the YUMA seems to be the limiting factor, maybe?
Will be there this night again, but it makes no sense before 21 or better 22 UTC i think.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 15.08.2013 22:23, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:
Hello Paul-Henrik, MW!
OH1AH is 569/579 in JN88KS.

Lubos, OK2BVG=A0
--------------070908050302040107050008--