Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.33.134 with SMTP id r6csp119134igi; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 05:04:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.208.66 with SMTP id mc2mr1678968wic.39.1376741062275; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 05:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ga19si698606wic.74.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 05:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VAeiY-0006R8-Dw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 12:30:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VAeiX-0006Qz-S6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 12:30:49 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VAeiV-0001Px-JN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 12:30:48 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r7HBUjxh011930 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:30:46 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r7HBUjpt021454 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:30:45 +0200 Message-ID: <520F5EE0.50309@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:30:40 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FC1DC8E@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<520BBEDD.1090004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FC1DCF7@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FC1DCF7@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Rik, MF, I can see you can receive me at -11 dB SNR in WSPR-2 on 630m at daytime. So i assume i am weak audible? Distance is 332 km which should be the limit of the groundwave. Your RX system must be very good. The SNR is 10...12 dB better than at PI4THT although the distance is nearly the same, and both completely over land. JO20IX looks like countryside compared to JO32KF. That seems to make a significant difference regarding man made noise. I have the same problems here :-( Or do you have a super special RX antenna? BTW last night EI0CF reported that he's using a beverage RX ant. Nice stuff! [...] Content analysis details: (-3.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 2015a9c9c70c0326c96b00c8a41f50f5 Subject: Re: LF: Belgium on 472 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040307080401010601010002" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2208 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040307080401010601010002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id r7HBUjxh011930 Hello Rik, MF, I can see you can receive me at -11 dB SNR in WSPR-2 on 630m at daytime.=20 So i assume i am weak audible? Distance is 332 km which should be the=20 limit of the groundwave. Your RX system must be very good. The SNR is 10...12 dB better than at=20 PI4THT although the distance is nearly the same, and both completely=20 over land. JO20IX looks like countryside compared to JO32KF. That seems=20 to make a significant difference regarding man made noise. I have the=20 same problems here :-( Or do you have a super special RX antenna? BTW last night EI0CF reported=20 that he's using a beverage RX ant. Nice stuff! I'm still hoping to find the limiting factor for my RX system. Is it the=20 non-optimal equipment or simly the location, i.e. can i improve it at=20 this location or did i already reach the best sensitivity i can get from=20 here. On MF i think i can't get much better, except by using directional=20 antennas, maybe. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 14.08.2013 23:42, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > > Hello Stefan, > > I hope just some days. Meanwhile I can transmit WSPR, WSJT-X etc... > > A short WSPR test got me a decode from G3XKR at 630 km. Last winter I=20 > got reports from up to 2000 km (on 501 kHz) with the same rig. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= - > *Van:* owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 > [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 > [Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de] > *Verzonden:* woensdag 14 augustus 2013 19:31 > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Onderwerp:* Re: LF: Belgium on 472 kHz > > Hi Rik, > > Good news! I hope to meet you on the band soon when the PA is working=20 > again. How long will it take to repair it? > Will you try WSPR during that time, using QRP? > > Vy 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > Am 14.08.2013 18:23, schrieb Rik Strobbe: >> >> Dear all, >> >> from today on Belgian holders of a HAREC licence are allowed to use=20 >> 472-479 kHz with 5 W EIRP on secondary base. No mode limitations. >> >> So far the good news. >> >> Bad news is that I started up the TX (after some months of rest) and=20 >> after one minute the was a "bang". A short check showed that the PS=20 >> failed (went from 15V to 22V). The PS was fixed (15V stabilisator=20 >> replaced), but the 22V also destroyed some IC's that are not on the=20 >> sheft in my shack. I have to order them and it can take some tome=20 >> to get QRV with full power (250W). >> >> Fortunately I stille have the 6W transverter working, so I can be QRV=20 >> with low power (estimated ERP =3D 20 mW) from now on. >> >> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >> --------------040307080401010601010002 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Rik, MF,

I can see you can receive me at -11 dB SNR in WSPR-2 on 630m at daytime. So i assume i am weak audible? Distance is 332 km which should be the limit of the groundwave.
Your RX system must be very good. The SNR is 10...12 dB better than at PI4THT although the distance is nearly the same, and both completely over land. JO20IX looks like countryside compared to JO32KF. That seems to make a significant difference regarding man made noise. I have the same problems here :-(
Or do you have a super special RX antenna? BTW last night EI0CF reported that he's using a beverage RX ant. Nice stuff!

I'm still hoping to find the limiting factor for my RX system. Is it the non-optimal equipment or simly the location, i.e. can i improve it at this location or did i already reach the best sensitivity i can get from here. On MF i think i can't get much better, except by using directional antennas, maybe.

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 14.08.2013 23:42, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

Hello Stefan,

 

I hope just some days. Meanwhile I can transmit WSPR, WSJT-X etc...

A short WSPR test got me a decode from G3XKR at 630 km. Last winter I got reports from up to 2000 km (on 501 kHz) with the same rig.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 


Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Stefan Schäfer [Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de]
Verzonden: woensdag 14 augustus 2013 19:31
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Onderwerp: Re: LF: Belgium on 472 kHz

Hi Rik,

Good news! I hope to meet you on the band soon when the PA is working again. How long will it take to repair it?
Will you try WSPR during that time, using QRP?

Vy 73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 14.08.2013 18:23, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

Dear all,

 

from today on Belgian holders of a HAREC licence are allowed to use 472-479 kHz with 5 W EIRP on secondary base. No mode limitations.

So far the good news.

Bad news is that I started up the TX (after some months of rest) and after one minute the was a "bang". A short check showed that the PS failed (went from 15V to 22V). The PS was fixed (15V stabilisator replaced), but the 22V also destroyed some IC's that are not on the sheft in my shack. I have to order them and it can take some tome to get QRV with full power (250W).

Fortunately I stille have the 6W transverter working, so I can be QRV with low power (estimated ERP = 20 mW) from now on.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

--------------040307080401010601010002--