Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.33.134 with SMTP id r6csp37601igi; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:50:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.5.134 with SMTP id s6mr3173191lbs.95.1375998604789; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m1si6684791lae.70.2013.08.08.14.50.03 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1V7Y50-0006kr-0U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:49:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1V7Y4z-0006kc-DQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:49:09 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1V7Y4x-0007D3-En for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:49:08 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r78Ln67J017164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 23:49:07 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r78Ln5Wd011175 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 23:49:06 +0200 Message-ID: <5204124C.603@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 23:49:00 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5202DE92.4040507@virginbroadband.com.au> <001101ce9428$e14548e0$0201a8c0@marco09cqcdi12> <5203E4A3.5050409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <2D8E764F8D76417B9A12E0A2C1904E87@White> In-Reply-To: <2D8E764F8D76417B9A12E0A2C1904E87@White> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus, I also had that thought! I even/already thought about a landing platform on the institutes roof, including 2 plates to make a contact for an automatic charging station!! :-) My holidays is over next week and i will ask, carefully, the right people :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 3dad7246509e3b317974c9d84e795ac1 Subject: Re: LF: Re: [OT] Quadrocopter antenna Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050507000609010007050602" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2913 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050507000609010007050602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id r78Ln67J017164 Hi Markus, I also had that thought! I even/already thought about a landing platform=20 on the institutes roof, including 2 plates to make a contact for an=20 automatic charging station!! :-) My holidays is over next week and i=20 will ask, carefully, the right people :-) 73, Stefan Am 08.08.2013 21:45, schrieb Markus Vester: > Hi Stefan, > maybe such a multicopter could be proposed as a worthwhile investment=20 > for your university institute? Measuring CO concentration at various=20 > altitudes, taking air probes, wind profiles and turbulence, you name=20 > it - all environmental physics! And of course you'd be the one=20 > designing and testing the telemetry system ;-) > Best 73, > Markus > > *From:* Stefan Sch=E4fer > *Sent:* Thursday, August 08, 2013 8:34 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: Re: [OT] Quadrocopter antenna > > Hi Marco, > > Am 08.08.2013 13:17, schrieb Marco Cadeddu: > > Beyond my concerns, my congrats in advance if somebody will try it! > > > > 73 de Marco IK1HSS > > Yesterday i had a phone call to a German shop who sells that DJI F550 > hexacopter. I got some more technical deteils and prices. Without the > camera option, just the flying hexacopter, LiPo accus, remote control, > GPS navigation + sensors, 2.4 GHz link hardware, charging station, the > costs are in the range of 1000 EUR. > That is more expensive than my car (10 years ago)! :-) > Of course it would be most fascinating, not only for amateur radio > experiments. Anyway i still fight with myselfe if i should invest so > much money for that stuff. > > On the other side i'm dreaming (!) ;-) about a 500m vertical or so. > Think about a MF transmitter that is connected to an antenna wire of > variable length. The ground losses are low, maybe here on the top of th= e > building. An amperemeter is already connected. The current is low, > first. Then you start the hexacopter and start to lift it. The wire is > rolled up and connected at the far end. Then the height reaches lambda/= 4 > and you can suddenly see the antenna current rising :-) As long as the > system is running on batteries only, one could use a simple > non-conducting line, say 20m long. Guess there will be no EMS problems > then. A power supply from the ground is a complete differnt thing. > > Could it be possible to rise a lambda/4 for 2200m? > > I have an idea: You will buy the equipment and i do the experiments, fo= r > you, and will inform you about the results! :-) > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > --------------050507000609010007050602 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Markus,

I also had that thought! I even/already thought about a landing platform on the institutes roof, including 2 plates to make a contact for an automatic charging station!! :-) My holidays is over next week and i will ask, carefully, the right people :-)

73, Stefan

Am 08.08.2013 21:45, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hi Stefan,
 
maybe such a multicopter could be proposed as a worthwhile investment for your university institute? Measuring CO concentration at various altitudes, taking air probes, wind profiles and turbulence, you name it - all environmental physics! And of course you'd be the one designing and testing the telemetry system ;-)
 
Best 73,
Markus
 

Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: [OT] Quadrocopter antenna

Hi Marco,

Am 08.08.2013 13:17, schrieb Marco Cadeddu:
> Beyond my concerns, my congrats in advance if somebody will try it!
>
> 73 de Marco IK1HSS

Yesterday i had a phone call to a German shop who sells that DJI F550
hexacopter. I got some more technical deteils and prices. Without the
camera option, just the flying hexacopter, LiPo accus, remote control,
GPS navigation + sensors, 2.4 GHz link hardware, charging station, the
costs are in the range of 1000 EUR.
That is more expensive than my car (10 years ago)! :-)
Of course it would be most fascinating, not only for amateur radio
experiments. Anyway i still fight with myselfe if i should invest so
much money for that stuff.

On the other side i'm dreaming (!) ;-) about a 500m vertical or so.
Think about a MF transmitter that is connected to an antenna wire of
variable length. The ground losses are low, maybe here on the top of the
building. An amperemeter is already connected. The current is low,
first. Then you start the hexacopter and start to lift it. The wire is
rolled up and connected at the far end. Then the height reaches lambda/4
and you can suddenly see the antenna current rising :-) As long as the
system is running on batteries only, one could use a simple
non-conducting line, say 20m long. Guess there will be no EMS problems
then. A power supply from the ground is a complete differnt thing.

Could it be possible to rise a lambda/4 for 2200m?

I have an idea: You will buy the equipment and i do the experiments, for
you, and will inform you about the results! :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

--------------050507000609010007050602--