Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.33.134 with SMTP id r6csp37578igi; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:49:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.14.225.199 with SMTP id z47mr5400165eep.24.1375998568687; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a41si12837046eew.206.2013.08.08.14.49.28 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1V7XyM-0006We-J4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:42:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1V7XyL-0006WV-SW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:42:17 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1V7XyJ-000798-Ii for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:42:16 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r78LgEiX012247 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 23:42:14 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r78LgE6r010997 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 23:42:14 +0200 Message-ID: <520410B1.4030700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 23:42:09 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi LF, There are some very clear traces of my signal on Edgar's grabber, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/testIDC.html between 20:30...21:00 UTC. But just a few pixels on the right frequency and time. If one knows that it could be my call then it is clear. But for a first detection i wouldn't call that "valid ID". Shows once again that OP32 or WSPR-15 is much more challenging! [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4ad5f3f1a9241b934aaa5d0e23c9dc57 Subject: LF: traces in VK7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1290 Hi LF, There are some very clear traces of my signal on Edgar's grabber, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/testIDC.html between 20:30...21:00 UTC. But just a few pixels on the right frequency and time. If one knows that it could be my call then it is clear. But for a first detection i wouldn't call that "valid ID". Shows once again that OP32 or WSPR-15 is much more challenging! That is the 2nd time since this season. The DCF-39 levels become very clearly better now, in SNR and time. 73, Stefan/DK7FC