Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.33.134 with SMTP id r6csp102780igi; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:43:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.121.65 with SMTP id li1mr15455489wjb.24.1375746184304; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pf5si783327wjb.13.2013.08.05.16.43.03 for ; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1V6TwU-0006w9-OR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:11:58 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1V6TwU-0006w0-5l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:11:58 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1V6TwR-0003Qd-J3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:11:57 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r75NBsYw025587 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 01:11:54 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r75NBsss023108 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 01:11:54 +0200 Message-ID: <52003135.1040807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 01:11:49 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51FDA127.80500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51FE3D6F.5040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51FE78BA.9040603@kabelmail.de> <51FFA7AF.6050407@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52002D06.9050601@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Warren, LF/VLF, I just found this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3yR-GxD1is Take a look at it. I can't find the words. I think i must have one :-) That must be _SEVERAL_ 100m above ground. I think we could even do VLF experiments with such a copter. Maybe a 500m vertical? I remember the weight of the wire in my 300m kite antenna test was about 1.5 kg, not more. So with 500m we could come lower than 5.17 kHz, like i did in 2010/2011. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 3d5b8cd6516ff44ac46de53952029be0 Subject: Re: LF: Quadrocopter antenna, sri, a bit OT Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010103080302000105060205" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2611 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010103080302000105060205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id r75NBsYw025587 Hi Warren, LF/VLF, I just found this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DG3yR-GxD1is Take a=20 look at it. I can't find the words. I think i must have one :-) That must be _SEVERAL_ 100m above ground. I think we could even do VLF=20 experiments with such a copter. Maybe a 500m vertical? I remember the=20 weight of the wire in my 300m kite antenna test was about 1.5 kg, not=20 more. So with 500m we could come lower than 5.17 kHz, like i did in=20 2010/2011. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 06.08.2013 01:02, schrieb Warren Ziegler: > Stefan, > But 100m is not better than your kite experiments! > Yes you gain control but not height. > You will still need a battery to land the quadcopter in the event of a=20 > failure of the power carrying wire. > > > 73 W > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 > > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just gathered some informations from the web. Just one example > for a, probably, suitable hexacopter to carry a LF transmit antenna. > > For example a DJI F550, see a video at > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DveDrtdE6njo or > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D2QC9so2so3Y). Looks like they can > easily lift 1 kg! You can fly about 10 minutes with a 5.3 Ah > battery. The battery voltage is to 11.1V...14.8V. So the power > consumption may be 200...300 W ! With a compact SMPS on the copter > and a 2 wire line it could be possible to carry the antenna. And > 100m is no problem too!! > I consider to buy one! And look this, most fascinating. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DJecyY79K7kY > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > Am 05.08.2013 15:25, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: >> >> Am 04.08.2013 17:52, schrieb DK1IS: >>> [...]But with nowadays quadrocopters and a "little" reduction of >>> the demands it should be possible to feed them from the ground >>> with DC (or AC plus converters for reduction of current) via 2 >>> wire line and having a good antenna too. >>> >>> 73, >>> Tom, DK1IS >> >> That's it! So, Markus, could you ask your friend abot some >> technical details? What is the supply voltage of the system and >> power consumption (or lifetime at a certain battery charge)? Is >> it possible to lift 1 kg and how does it change the power >> consumption? It should be no problem to feed DC to the system or >> a compact power supply in the sky and normal 230V mains at ground >> (todays PSUs have an input voltage range of 85...240V AC, so a >> certain voltage drop on the thin wire should be no problem. >> Maybe you can do some tests? >> >> The advatages are clear. A quadrocopter keeps the position and >> height, even in smaller wind blasts while a balloon bounces left >> and right. The costs of Helium will quickly overcome the costs >> for a quadrocopter. Ah and such a project is simply more >> interesting i guess :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > > --=20 > 73 Warren K2ORS > WD2XGJ > WD2XSH/23 > WE2XEB/2 > WE2XGR/1 > --------------010103080302000105060205 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Warren, LF/VLF,

I just found this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3yR-GxD1is  Take a look at it. I can't find the words. I think i must have one :-)
That must be SEVERAL 100m above ground. I think we could even do VLF experiments with such a copter. Maybe a 500m vertical? I remember the weight of the wire in my 300m kite antenna test was about 1.5 kg, not more. So with 500m we could come lower than 5.17 kHz, like i did in 2010/2011.

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 06.08.2013 01:02, schrieb Warren Ziegler:
Stefan,
    But 100m is not better than your kite experiments!
Yes you gain control but not height. 
You will still need a battery to land the quadcopter in the event of a failure of the power carrying wire.


73 W


On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
Hi all,

I just gathered some informations from the web. Just one example for a, probably, suitable hexacopter to carry a LF transmit antenna.

For example a DJI F550, see a video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veDrtdE6njo or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QC9so2so3Y). Looks like they can easily lift 1 kg! You can fly about 10 minutes with a 5.3 Ah battery. The battery voltage is to 11.1V...14.8V. So the power consumption may be 200...300 W ! With a compact SMPS on the copter and a 2 wire line it could be possible to carry the antenna. And 100m is no problem too!!
I consider to buy one! And look this, most fascinating. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JecyY79K7kY

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 05.08.2013 15:25, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:

Am 04.08.2013 17:52, schrieb DK1IS:
[...]But with nowadays quadrocopters and a "little" reduction of the demands it should be possible to feed them from the ground with DC (or AC plus converters for reduction of current) via 2 wire line and having a good antenna too.

73,
Tom, DK1IS

That's it! So, Markus, could you ask your friend abot some technical details? What is the supply voltage of the system and power consumption (or lifetime at a certain battery charge)? Is it possible to lift 1 kg and how does it change the power consumption? It should be no problem to feed DC to the system or a compact power supply in the sky and normal 230V mains at ground (todays PSUs have an input voltage range of 85...240V AC, so a certain voltage drop on the thin wire should be no problem.
Maybe you can do some tests?

The advatages are clear. A quadrocopter keeps the position and height, even in smaller wind blasts while a balloon bounces left and right. The costs of Helium will quickly overcome the costs for a quadrocopter. Ah and such a project is simply more interesting i guess :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC



--
73 Warren K2ORS
                WD2XGJ
                WD2XSH/23
                WE2XEB/2
                WE2XGR/1

 
--------------010103080302000105060205--