Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.33.134 with SMTP id r6csp34465igi; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 05:58:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.11.233 with SMTP id t9mr3887021wib.41.1375621088420; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 05:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id wz6si3820508wjc.93.2013.08.04.05.58.07 for ; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 05:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1V5xF4-0000uc-Ia for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 13:16:58 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1V5xF4-0000uT-65 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 13:16:58 +0100 Received: from mta21.charter.net ([216.33.127.81]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1V5xF2-000554-7h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 13:16:57 +0100 Received: from imp10 ([10.20.200.15]) by mta21.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP id <20130804121654.UFNE10448.mta21.charter.net@imp10> for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 08:16:54 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.143] ([75.130.240.66]) by imp10 with smtp.charter.net id 8cGt1m00E1SfLdX05cGujz; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 08:16:54 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=foeE/yEf c=1 sm=1 a=aCwedTPYq0ogv8KiwRKauA==:17 a=x49a4zlv9MUA:10 a=0g5ImgW44TsA:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=71nC4Wke_oIA:10 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=YqhTN34uFBEnYCRAiWwA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=tn2C1hcdxckA:10 a=eHoveaaUoNYA:10 a=vLi-Ompsu60A:10 a=aCwedTPYq0ogv8KiwRKauA==:117 Message-ID: <51FE4899.8010206@charter.net> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 08:27:05 -0400 From: John Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51FDA127.80500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51FE3D6F.5040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <51FE3D6F.5040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, > I don't know anything about LF propagation on that band. Is it much > different to 2200m? And what are the distance records? Mike, G3XDV, kept a nice record of it: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.dennison/index/lf/transcontinental/2001-2/at2001-2.htm [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.33.127.81 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: e4383209d2ccb9552700d53c0b540538 Subject: Re: LF: USA issued 68 to 76 kHz band with 10 W ERP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3094 Stefan, > I don't know anything about LF propagation on that band. Is it much > different to 2200m? And what are the distance records? Mike, G3XDV, kept a nice record of it: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.dennison/index/lf/transcontinental/2001-2/at2001-2.htm John, W1TAG