Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.33.134 with SMTP id r6csp32289igi; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 04:50:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.204.186.8 with SMTP id cq8mr2064124bkb.129.1375617048653; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 04:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id oy10si2215271bkb.121.2013.08.04.04.50.48 for ; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 04:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1V5wop-0000fa-Oj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 12:49:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1V5wop-0000fR-Bs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 12:49:51 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1V5won-0004x6-3Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 12:49:50 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r74Bnm3X005292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 13:49:48 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r74BnlXH016569 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 13:49:47 +0200 Message-ID: <51FE3FD7.8010001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 13:49:43 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51FDA127.80500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51FE3D6F.5040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <51FE3D6F.5040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 04.08.2013 13:39, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > The radiation resistance of the wire is about 1/4 and the needed L is > about 4x, so the coil losses will be 4x higher too. Ehm, no, just 2x higher of course. But there are further parameters that will change, like the skin depth. So it is a rough estimation... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 33d261536bb1467bb13d5764461d5ec4 Subject: Re: LF: USA issued 68 to 76 kHz band with 10 W ERP Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040000000204020305020607" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3092 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040000000204020305020607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id r74Bnm3X005292 Am 04.08.2013 13:39, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: > The radiation resistance of the wire is about 1/4 and the needed L is=20 > about 4x, so the coil losses will be 4x higher too. Ehm, no, just 2x higher of course. But there are further parameters that=20 will change, like the skin depth. So it is a rough estimation... 73, Stefan --------------040000000204020305020607 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Am 04.08.2013 13:39, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
The radiation resistance of the wire is about 1/4 and the needed L is about 4x, so the coil losses will be 4x higher too.
Ehm, no, just 2x higher of course. But there are further parameters that will change, like the skin depth. So it is a rough estimation...

73, Stefan
 --------------040000000204020305020607--