Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <51FC251F.7080006@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:31:11 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <51F98D4E.8070802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <BLU177-W433E31B69AC42D964D2012CF570@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU177-W433E31B69AC42D964D2012CF570@phx.gbl>
Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------070300070702080402010006"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070300070702080402010006
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Laurence,

I guess that 160m propagation is quite different to 630m propagation, 
although it's both MF.
Was the ERP in these tests the same on both bands?

73, Stefan

Am 01.08.2013 01:23, schrieb Laurence KL7 L:
> Ill take a look but its awfully light on the Eu path Stefan -
>
> Weve been up on 630 and 160m WSPR 2 running tests to VK over this past 
> week - no luck on 630m from my end but reasonable openings on the gray 
> line on 160 both ways...
>
> Cheers
>
> Laurence KL7 L Wasilla Palmer Alaska
>
>
>
>
> > I'm TXing again on 136.172 kHz DFCW-90. Anyone else?
> > Reports welcome.
> >
> > 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> >
>

--------------070300070702080402010006
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Laurence, <br>
<br>
I guess that 160m propagation is quite different to 630m propagation,
although it's both MF.<br>
Was the ERP in these tests the same on both bands?<br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
Am 01.08.2013 01:23, schrieb Laurence KL7 L:
<blockquote cite="mid:BLU177-W433E31B69AC42D964D2012CF570@phx.gbl"
 type="cite">
  <style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style>
  <div dir="ltr">Ill take a look but its awfully&nbsp;light on the Eu path
Stefan -<br>
&nbsp;<br>
Weve been up on 630 and 160m WSPR 2&nbsp;running tests to VK over this past
week - no luck on 630m from my end&nbsp;but reasonable openings on the gray
line on 160 both ways...<br>
&nbsp;<br>
Cheers<br>
&nbsp;<br>
Laurence KL7 L Wasilla Palmer Alaska<br>
&nbsp;<br>
&nbsp;<br>
&nbsp;<br>
  <br>
&gt; I'm TXing again on 136.172 kHz DFCW-90. Anyone else?<br>
&gt; Reports welcome.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; 73, Stefan/DK7FC<br>
&gt; <br>
  <br>
  </div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------070300070702080402010006--