Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.33.134 with SMTP id r6csp48800igi; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:49:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.109.10 with SMTP id ho10mr5643571wib.14.1376858960431; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j16si2791507wic.85.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VB9NY-0003BY-22 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:15:12 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VB9NX-0003BG-6I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:15:11 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VB9NV-0006A7-2S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:15:10 +0100 Received: from Clemens0811 ([91.57.89.83]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0M5q45-1VzgbD1bon-00xrFF for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:15:07 +0200 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <520F60AF.2000004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0127125B54F94B748D9AC87A4A813300@Clemens0811> <5210BB04.9000401@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <5210BB04.9000401@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:15:03 +0200 Message-ID: <43CE531FA581432E99864AD4EC53B50D@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 Thread-Index: Ac6cDOU/HMNFUOYCSpOaScsQabcbgQAPtv+g X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:dlblp4eNPEsmb/K9JqE2KwB0lEm9Fst4v539svBz1H6UZTMLk8r BI90jSBw/sH/+b5PMqSOPDSXCWdw6wl0BfPkBainRMefTv7P2YTfsvAHEj8C1t48s2PBLWf P2gbiK3SyoinXKhiwTTCY5rarkIv7inlA0uSOt/uhHssi0UiECqoAllhcdsUjRt1/aBkLWB mFqjtYWskSDb6kv4sbZTw== X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, >But why did you >write that email at 10 hours after the QSO took place? When beeing in >the shack, i'm mostly watching incoming emails I was unsure if you would do that, so I decided to resort to listening to the interesting stuff you were talking about (antennas,drinks, girls...:-) ). [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -2.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_FRT_CLICK BODY: ReplaceTags: Click X-Scan-Signature: b1e5ebccbad86c8ca1fd46d24f0285de Subject: RE: LF: QRM on 472.5kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1578 Hi Stefan,=20 >But why did you=20 >write that email at 10 hours after the QSO took place? When beeing in=20 >the shack, i'm mostly watching incoming emails I was unsure if you would do that, so I decided to resort to listening = to the interesting stuff you were talking about (antennas,drinks, girls...:-) = ). >And they all use true class D PAs. >Somehow most of the active CW stations do not have a "clean"=20 >signal and=20 >those who have a clean signal are not QRV :-) I have no hands-on experience with class D PAs,only class B, but it seems that key klicks with class D are NOT inevitable,see http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php?action=3Dprintpage;topic=3D28417.0 Quoting from there: --------------------------- "...Well, I know from the tube days that you couldn't just key the drive = to a tube class C final - major key clicks. The same goes for class C, D = or E solid state amps. You can't just key the drive - same problem - key = clicks. This is because the shape of the keying waveform is not preserved in = class C, D, E or F due to the fact that the amplifiers are not linear (nor = should they be!!). "Overshaping" of the input waveform is NOT recommended with MOSFETs = because they have so much gain. A parasitic can result when the MOSFETs are operating in the linear region. And if you are using digital drive = (which is a better way of driving MOSFETs) you can't even overshape the input. So, what is generally done is to key the drive and key the high voltage using a series element (a MOSFET or MOSFETs in parallel) - with the = input to the series element being a good CW rise and fall time. The series = element is most easily created using a source follower and some type of pull up = with controlled rise and fall times. Easy to do with simple R/C circuits. " ------------end of quote-------------------- So my main point is that it should be doable for a serious homebrewer to generate a (nearly) key klick free CW signal also with a class D amp. The stronger the signal the more important is a clean spectrum. >Did you listen by ear or did you use a CW decoder? My aural limit is at about 12-15wpm and you were going near 30wpm... My compliments! 73 Clemens DL4RAJ=20 =20 =20 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer >Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 2:16 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: QRM on 472.5kHz