Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.1.100 with SMTP id 4csp128881igl; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:23:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.182.83 with SMTP id ec19mr4299374wic.0.1373721837146; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r3si14731506wjw.75.2013.07.13.06.23.56 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UxxTr-0007mz-Tk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:55:11 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UxxTr-0007mo-H4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:55:11 +0100 Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.26]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UxxTp-0006vk-6x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:55:10 +0100 Received: from pc-roelof (ndb.demon.nl [82.161.81.65]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6DAt2JC067760 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:55:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roelof@ndb.demon.nl) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51D498BD.3050007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005b01ce798a$b0476600$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <20130706131640.GG5246@cs.utwente.nl> <7D6B8CBB38964C9C82487F5D0F3648FC@FMVXD1232> <20130707203537.GA30691@cs.utwente.nl> <51DA00C8.6000600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA0212.8020808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA03CE.6020508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA1680.6030602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DB6CB3.2080708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001601ce7c95$f235b360$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <51DBFF7D.9050807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DC58E9.5030005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DF1D06.8020208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DF43E7.8080300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51E125D4.3050804@virginbroadband.com.au> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:55:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Roelof Bakker" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <51E125D4.3050804@virginbroadband.com.au> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Edgar, I don't know how linear these devices are, but that will show up in actual use. The SFH756V and SFH350V are housed in a moulded plastic casing with a cable clamp: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.109.24.26 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: Re: LF: Re: MiniWhip antenna, fiber optic TEST SIGNALS NEEDED on 630m WSPR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2831 Hello Edgar, I don't know how linear these devices are, but that will show up in actual use. The SFH756V and SFH350V are housed in a moulded plastic casing with a cable clamp: http://www.avagotech.com/pages/en/fiber_optics/general_purpose_industrial_control_data_link_650nm/sfh756v/ I also found that for a wider bandwidth the SFH 757V / SFH 250V are more suitable. These are rated at 100 MBd. I will order them in the near future. 73, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt