MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.57.9 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 00:27:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [80.195.207.132] In-Reply-To: <977A4C4B-4EE3-4BBD-9B0E-15DC077C197C@gmail.com> References: <977A4C4B-4EE3-4BBD-9B0E-15DC077C197C@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 08:27:07 +0100 Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Message-ID: Subject: Re: LF: Wellbrook RX loops From: DAVE PICK To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2359374d7bf204e0be9fb9 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3340 --e89a8f2359374d7bf204e0be9fb9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Roger I have used a Wellbrook for many years on 136 and (now) on 472kHz. It performs well but it will put massive signals from broadcast stations into your RX! You may need a band-pass filter between the loop and the receiver. Obviously it is directional. It will be around 10dB down on a proper aerial, but that's not a problem on LF. Dave G3YXM On 5 July 2013 08:00, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Can anyone advise, from actual use, how well a Wellbrook loop works on > 136 and 472kHz RX ? The excellent OIP2 and OIP3 figures and directivity > suggest one could be very useful. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > --e89a8f2359374d7bf204e0be9fb9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Roger

I have used a Wellbrook = for many years on 136 and (now) on 472kHz. It performs well but it will put= massive signals from broadcast stations into your RX! You may need a band-= pass filter between the loop and the receiver. Obviously it is directional.=
It will be around 10dB down on a proper aerial, but that's not a = problem on LF.

Dave G3YXM
=

On 5 July 2013 08:00, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:
Can anyone advise, from actual use, =A0how w= ell a Wellbrook loop works on 136 and 472kHz RX ? The excellent OIP2 and OI= P3 figures and directivity suggest one could be very useful.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--e89a8f2359374d7bf204e0be9fb9--