Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.57.9 with SMTP id e9csp64083igq; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:08:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.103.73 with SMTP id fu9mr21583368wjb.70.1372723695465; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id vo8si7320741wjc.123.2013.07.01.17.08.13 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UtngD-0001v8-3i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:38:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UtngC-0001uz-By for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:38:44 +0100 Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Utng9-0003cU-VL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:38:43 +0100 Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ar20so10933883iec.35 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:38:39 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eCDZp4t/gHZ9scaKYMbN8aRrDZGVBnWyH1Fu9UgKFc0=; b=MzzaoxmBviRrK7g4QmXNUJ+FO7UFirvXPZp+5PPON2PXAiY5XAUfNG5Rtsd+KbXiRi rF7pUUoHDjm1XRuzJMWuvjf6n4RIOnybD2pfGNjd+ZfNT9j4fNOqVZe5fLKvXENiiZfP klLd2chLkwDU+amv9m28lnLdtcX3oupVa/wlp9Q6C95UeE/N7s7cIWZptgB6019xFua0 6r8QeZHkIjpVcN3JlLYoOWmyxf8cF+OaSVw9oUrhGFFfHNfQ2TWDsVKsQjTpat9qpf3/ Gkwf6y2I5nIhXzuBxwBH1wTsBzhmZRh4IDSrwRAWwc/7BIylq1xKA1rq+b5OwETAokl8 FbRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.176.131 with SMTP id ci3mr10379783igc.18.1372721918973; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.87.161 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 16:38:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51D208B6.2000807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <6CCE2CE4841C49D39BC5810DDC9E4D88@White> <51BE367C.3040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51BE6AB5.4030505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51BEF3FD.90605@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <71C2BD63B2FC4F2EA23383DFA6657557@AGB> <51C04EED.60908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51C0E571.2020107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <145A8CBDD36B4CB7B78A5B750BBCE398@AGB> <000e01ce6c93$f23eb030$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <51C1914F.70503@charter.net> <51C1A4FD.6030400@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <227A9E203A3F40F7A5CF50E8FC7C7822@AGB> <51C2FC05.4020009@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <98415A615E4C4DF08B26461C02C274A7@AGB> <51C36896.5060900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <081A3386AB9D4358A821F4E5C0F31D80@White> <51C439B0.5060806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51D208B6.2000807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 09:38:38 +1000 Message-ID: From: Dimitrios Tsifakis To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, VK dominates WSPR in numbers but not in records - yet! :-) I have been busy with university homework but that's finishing now, so I will get busy with radio again. My latest experiment is a very simple WSPR-2 Arduino/DDS/Class-E transmitter. The web page below is work in progress: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.223.176 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dtsifakis[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: d7907c3bf895ca41e0bedc3fa074f0d4 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-2 on 630m last night Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3309 Hi Stefan, VK dominates WSPR in numbers but not in records - yet! :-) I have been busy with university homework but that's finishing now, so I will get busy with radio again. My latest experiment is a very simple WSPR-2 Arduino/DDS/Class-E transmitter. The web page below is work in progress: http://people.physics.anu.edu.au/~dxt103/472/wspr_tx/ I have also been doing some tests with a very restricted antenna just to prove the point that a super large antenna is not the only way to enjoy the new low bands. Last weekend I did a quick test with the WSPR beacon from my block of land outside Canberra, using the earth dipole antenna. I was able to cover 180 km with only 5 W and I know what to do to improve this. Can't beat a ground antenna when it comes to convenience! 73, Dimitris Vk1SV 2013/7/2 Stefan Sch=E4fer : > Hi Dimitris, > > Am 01.07.2013 06:02, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > >> Not only it's winter, but I noticed that VK dominates WSPR on 630m on a >> regular basis :-) > > Are you sure? :-) > > >> There are plenty of stations monitoring, from all over the country, >> including, from time to time, one from Perth, Western Australia. > > Yes, i see. It is very nice to see so much activity from down under. But > where are all the ZL stations? > > >> So far, we haven't managed to repeat the VK1DSH->F6CNI record but perhap= s, >> if the activity keeps to a high level, it's a matter of time until an EU >> station is received here. > > That was a very rare event i guess. But we'll try. Thanks for the > motivation. BTW soon the LF DX season starts again and Edgar has done a l= ot > of effort to prepare for a new #3 DX WR on LF. I'll try to transmit as mu= ch > as possible, either on MF or on LF. Actually i should really build an > automatic antenna switch. Then i can send a MF WSPR 2 block between the g= ap > of 2 LF DFCW-180 elements :-) > > Have fun and good luck! > Any new /p experiments from your side? And how does the tube PA perform n= ow? > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > >> >> 73, Dimitris VK1SV > >