Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.1.100 with SMTP id 4csp128884igl; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:24:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.185.101 with SMTP id fb5mr4210696wic.44.1373721838687; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m4si2347445wiw.0.2013.07.13.06.23.57 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Uxwfd-0007Vq-S5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:03:17 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Uxwfd-0007Vh-62 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:03:17 +0100 Received: from smtp2.virginbroadband.com.au ([123.200.191.52] helo=smtp.virginbroadband.com.au) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UxwfZ-0006mb-ST for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:03:16 +0100 Received: from [123.200.240.6] (unknown [123.200.240.6]) by smtp.virginbroadband.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32FF9008A3 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 20:03:03 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <51E125D4.3050804@virginbroadband.com.au> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 20:03:00 +1000 From: edgar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51D498BD.3050007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005b01ce798a$b0476600$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <20130706131640.GG5246@cs.utwente.nl> <7D6B8CBB38964C9C82487F5D0F3648FC@FMVXD1232> <20130707203537.GA30691@cs.utwente.nl> <51DA00C8.6000600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA0212.8020808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA03CE.6020508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA1680.6030602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DB6CB3.2080708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001601ce7c95$f235b360$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <51DBFF7D.9050807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DC58E9.5030005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DF1D06.8020208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DF43E7.8080300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 123.200.191.52 (smtp2.virginbroadband.com.au) used invalid HELO/EHLO smtp.virginbroadband.com.au - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Roelof, Is the signal transfer in the fibre optic transmitter, receiver and cable linear? Also would it reduce the losses if led transmitter and receiving photo transistor were [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [123.200.191.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: Re: LF: Re: MiniWhip antenna, fiber optic TEST SIGNALS NEEDED on 630m WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2832 Hi Roelof, Is the signal transfer in the fibre optic transmitter, receiver and cable linear? Also would it reduce the losses if led transmitter and receiving photo transistor were mounted at each end of a plastic tube to transfer the signal from the MiniWhip? Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania.