Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.1.100 with SMTP id 4csp47231igl; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:37:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.15.23.194 with SMTP id h42mr42151566eeu.123.1373567820473; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i44si29760943eew.337.2013.07.11.11.37.00 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UxLEB-000305-DK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:04:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UxLEA-0002zw-P0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:04:26 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UxLE9-0001wQ-0b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:04:25 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6BI4MaS006881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:04:23 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r6BI4N6A022074 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:04:23 +0200 Message-ID: <51DEF3A1.6080103@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:04:17 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51DEEF62.3000105@kabelmail.de> In-Reply-To: <51DEEF62.3000105@kabelmail.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Tom, See my grabber: http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_MF_Grabber.html There was QRSS in that range. It is configured for QRSS-10, just for tests, not for QSOs since QRSS is not necessary on MF. I've been received at KU4XR in QRSS-10 last year: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/DK7FC_QRSS-10_476_KHz_12-28-2012.jpg [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: Re: LF: QRSS/DFCW on 630 meters? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2606 Hello Tom, See my grabber: http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_MF_Grabber.html There was QRSS in that range. It is configured for QRSS-10, just for tests, not for QSOs since QRSS is not necessary on MF. I've been received at KU4XR in QRSS-10 last year: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/DK7FC_QRSS-10_476_KHz_12-28-2012.jpg 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 11.07.2013 19:46, schrieb DK1IS: > Hello group, > > perhaps a strange question but I obviously missed former discussions > about this item: > > Are there any preferred frequency ranges for classic QRSS or DFCW on > the 630 meter band? Of course I could/should listen by myself but to > check 7 kHz for random traffic with 180 Hz or even lower Argo bandwith > would be a task with uncertain results ... > > Tu es 73, > Tom, DK1IS > www.qrz.com/db/dk1is >