Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.1.100 with SMTP id 4csp47229igl; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:36:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.14.99.71 with SMTP id w47mr43328969eef.140.1373567819063; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a48si3580771eep.143.2013.07.11.11.36.58 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UxKwW-0002rr-1R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:46:12 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UxKwV-0002ri-If for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:46:11 +0100 Received: from smtpa1.mediabeam.com ([194.25.41.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UxKwT-0001se-S0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:46:10 +0100 Received: from IMAP3 (balancer7.mediabeam.com [10.100.1.80]) by smtpa1.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r6BHk0mw025953; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:46:00 +0200 Received: from [192.168.178.33] (188-195-84-36-dynip.superkabel.de [188.195.84.36] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpa.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r6BHjwWn025908 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:46:00 +0200 X-mediaBEAM-Originating-IP: [188.195.84.36] X-mediaBEAM-AUTHID: [DK1IS@kabelmail.de] Message-ID: <51DEEF62.3000105@kabelmail.de> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:46:10 +0200 From: DK1IS User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello group, perhaps a strange question but I obviously missed former discussions about this item: Are there any preferred frequency ranges for classic QRSS or DFCW on the 630 meter band? Of course I could/should listen by myself but to check 7 kHz for random traffic with 180 Hz or even lower Argo bandwith would be a task with uncertain results ... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.25.41.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 4d4a9e8f68fb15c54898568240f542c5 Subject: LF: QRSS/DFCW on 630 meters? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 693 Hello group, perhaps a strange question but I obviously missed former discussions about this item: Are there any preferred frequency ranges for classic QRSS or DFCW on the 630 meter band? Of course I could/should listen by myself but to check 7 kHz for random traffic with 180 Hz or even lower Argo bandwith would be a task with uncertain results ... Tu es 73, Tom, DK1IS www.qrz.com/db/dk1is