Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.57.9 with SMTP id e9csp144577igq; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 09:21:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.14.7.2 with SMTP id 2mr20923058eeo.145.1373214071439; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 09:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r42si13493617eep.32.2013.07.07.09.21.11 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 09:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UvrOg-0000sp-4o for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 17:01:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UvrOf-0000sg-P0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 17:01:09 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UvrOe-0002PC-7q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 17:01:08 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r67G16LA012832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:01:06 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r67G15Pv027270 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:01:05 +0200 Message-ID: <51D990BD.5010604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:01:01 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51D498BD.3050007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005b01ce798a$b0476600$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <20130706131640.GG5246@cs.utwente.nl> <51D834D6.9050403@kabelmail.de> <8C9E7EDCA83145B4B00E1D951DC401B1@Clemens0811> In-Reply-To: <8C9E7EDCA83145B4B00E1D951DC401B1@Clemens0811> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Clemens, Am 06.07.2013 18:14, schrieb Clemens Paul: > [...] > I would second Jays argument that it is virtually impossible to isolate the > feedline > effectively from the E-probe. > > 73 > Clemens > DL4RAJ ...thus it would be useful to use a battery supply and a RF link or a fiber optic cable link. I have done some tests in the past... [...] Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4ad5f3f1a9241b934aaa5d0e23c9dc57 Subject: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3131 Hi Clemens, Am 06.07.2013 18:14, schrieb Clemens Paul: > [...] > I would second Jays argument that it is virtually impossible to isolate the > feedline > effectively from the E-probe. > > 73 > Clemens > DL4RAJ ...thus it would be useful to use a battery supply and a RF link or a fiber optic cable link. I have done some tests in the past... 73, Stefan/DK7FC