Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4FAF338000093; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 12:27:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ukd1W-00023J-24 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:26:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ukd1V-00023A-Ku for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:26:49 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Ukd1P-0005IG-U3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:26:48 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r56GQcEg011064 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:56:41 -0230 Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:56:38 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <89839D0C2679435898627697705F04C3@F6CNIAndyHP> Message-ID: References: <51AA488C.4020800@eastlink.ca> <9F4D930ED1F64F7C974C9F3570FE5DEA@White> <106509721.20130603101147@mterrier.net> <511259661.20130605104210@mterrier.net> <22F50727DAB943178CABF2FE9A731025@GaryAsus> <89A40DBD5FD24F7DAF1DC48FF71ABC37@White> <006801ce6251$bbd6c290$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <89839D0C2679435898627697705F04C3@F6CNIAndyHP> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Andy and thanks for the report and gratifying info on the stability. It seems to be working quite well and the frequency reports are very good, given that the DDS resolution is about 15 mHz. To Jay, thanks for the info on your RX ant. This explains why the sigs are not seen sometimes, but there is still some directionality with the wire (assuming the tower to be omni). The wire actually appears to have some gain towards the east, but is weaker than the tower towards the west. The wire is also lower than the tower. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA - 137.7770 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14751b0b88a566d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Andy and thanks for the report and gratifying info on the stability. It seems to be working quite well and the frequency reports are very good, given that the DDS resolution is about 15 mHz. To Jay, thanks for the info on your RX ant. This explains why the sigs are not seen sometimes, but there is still some directionality with the wire (assuming the tower to be omni). The wire actually appears to have some gain towards the east, but is weaker than the tower towards the west. The wire is also lower than the tower. Graham, G0NBD, could you suggest a good QRG for OP32 now that the TX is no longer rock bound on 137.777 kHz as it has been for the past decade. Incidently, last month marked the 10th anniversary of the reception by Alan, G3NYK of my QRSS75 on 137.777 kHz. This was the first TA signal=20 received from NL Canada. The source was an old Peggelsender running on 13.7777 kHz divided down by a pair of 7490 decade counters. It was not very stable and so was replaced by a 13.7 MHz xtal in a ocxo. The TX will be on again tonight with hourly QRSS30 starting 0000 utc. 73 & GL Joe VO1NA On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Andre Guy=E9 wrote: > Hello Joe, > > No problem. As usual, your QRSS signal gave here a strong trace this morn= ing=20 > with peak around 0230 TU. Stable signal better than .005 Hz / 2 hours, no= =20 > chirp. This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php