Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E2CFE38000082; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:22:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Upp64-0002d3-05 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:21:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Upp63-0002cu-Is for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:20:59 +0100 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Upp61-0004Qx-D7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:20:58 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.31.70.83]) by mwinf5d09 with ME id qoLv1l0071no4Z603oLvuV; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 02:20:55 +0200 Message-ID: <53609E529AE24CD0981F9B138D50150F@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <6CCE2CE4841C49D39BC5810DDC9E4D88@White> <51BE367C.3040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51BE6AB5.4030505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51BEF3FD.90605@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <71C2BD63B2FC4F2EA23383DFA6657557@AGB> <51C04EED.60908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51C0E571.2020107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <145A8CBDD36B4CB7B78A5B750BBCE398@AGB> <000e01ce6c93$f23eb030$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <51C1914F.70503@charter.net> <51C1A4FD.6030400@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <227A9E203A3F40F7A5CF50E8FC7C7822@AGB> <51C2FC05.4020009@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <98415A615E4C4DF08B26461C02C274A7@AGB> <51C36896.5060900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:20:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ok Joe , If your not in 'rx' mode , you can run at 100% , tx cycle , that's still at 50% duty cycle not many showing on the map at the moment , this time last night , there where 20 ! Ive posted in the Opera and Rsgb Lf groups , in case some one picks up on it later , your side . [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 77d68ebd44814a6def4d7158b7296e78 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA OP32 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=LARGE_HEX,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14951c39ca85c46 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Ok Joe , If your not in 'rx' mode , you can run at 100% , tx cycle , that's still at 50% duty cycle not many showing on the map at the moment , this time last night , there where 20 ! Ive posted in the Opera and Rsgb Lf groups , in case some one picks up on it later , your side . GL-73-G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 1:08 AM To: Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA OP32 > Thanks Graham for the info. The transmission was delayed by > one minute and started at 0000utc. Tonight's programme: > ~36 mins of opera, ~36 mins of silence, ~36 mins of opera,... > until EU dawn or so. > > 73 Joe VO1NA > > On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Graham wrote: > >> Thanks Joe, >> >> This is the pattern from the software , should be the same ! >> >> Symbol time is important , the data clock needs to be as good as >> possible , by 'good' that is as good as a 'pc' not as in uHz , >> clock drift and/or pulse width will affect the minimum decode s/n >> , >> >> Good luck 73-G.. >> >> >> Symbol times >> >> Opera05: 0.128 s >> Opera1: 0.256 s >> Opera2: 0.512 s >> Opera4: 1.024 s >> Opera8: 2.048 s >> Opera32: 8.192 s >> >> VO1NA >> >> 11011010100101010110100101100110100101011001100110101010101010100110011001100101100101101001011001011010011010101010101010101010100110101010101010010101011010010110101010011001100110011010101010101001011001010110010110010110100101101001101 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: >> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 11:14 PM >> To: >> Subject: LF: VO1NA OP32 >> >>> Dear Group, >>> >>> With many thanks to the group members for their kind assistance, Markus >>> and Graham in particular, A satisfactory exciter is presently QRV >>> and will be returning the OP32 code (that Makus recently sent by email) >>> on 137.555 kHz starting tonight 20 June at 2359 utc. The back-yard >>> photon >>> flux will be ~10^30/s. >>> >>> Good luck to any who will be monitoring and please feel free to let >>> me know if you receive an indication of the sigs. >>> >>> 73 >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at >>> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >>> >> >> > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >