Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5204E380000B6; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:59:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UqXhN-0001rr-P1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 00:58:29 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UqXhN-0001ri-AJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 00:58:29 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UqXhL-0003hd-G3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 00:58:28 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5MNwQKc011726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 01:58:26 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r5MNwQ5f001393 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 01:58:26 +0200 Message-ID: <51C63A1D.90404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 01:58:21 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51C62E1D.5010905@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK, TNX anyway. At least you have a first impression what is possible. There is much QRN here which rises the noise background permanently. The background is at least 6 dB higher than normal. So we may have much better chances on another day and in winter anyway. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 1273381c241b4bc851b7e848e0897dc9 Subject: Re: LF: QRV 630 m. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030502000801080009060803" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8b51c63a5600b0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030502000801080009060803 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id r5MNwQKc011726 OK, TNX anyway. At least you have a first impression what is possible. There is much QRN here which rises the noise background permanently. The=20 background is at least 6 dB higher than normal. So we may have much=20 better chances on another day and in winter anyway. Did you try TXing WSPR on 630m? This could give you more informations=20 about your own station performance... 73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC Am 23.06.2013 01:49, schrieb Federico: > Ur RST is 529/539, but no reponse to my calls. SRI > TNX de Federico EA2HB. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Stefan Sch=E4fer > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Sunday, June 23, 2013 1:07 AM > *Subject:* Re: LF: QRV 630 m. > > 23 UTC. I'm on air now, 472.2 kHz. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 22.06.2013 15:50, schrieb Federico: >> Hi all >> After two nights of WSPR RX, the next night, I will be calling CQ >> and QRV in 472.2 khz from 23 UTC until 24 or so. >> See if activated Spain in the band. >> TNX to WSPR stations. >> 73 ES HPE CUAGN >> Federico EA2HB > --------------030502000801080009060803 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK, TNX anyway. At least you have a first impression what is possible.
There is much QRN here which rises the noise background permanently. The background is at least 6 dB higher than normal. So we may have much better chances on another day and in winter anyway.

Did you try TXing WSPR on 630m? This could give you more informations about your own station performance...

73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 23.06.2013 01:49, schrieb Federico:
Ur RST is 529/539, but no reponse to my calls.  SRI
 
TNX  de Federico EA2HB.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2013 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: LF: QRV 630 m.

23 UTC. I'm on air now, 472.2 kHz.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 22.06.2013 15:50, schrieb Federico:
Hi all
 
After two nights of WSPR RX, the next night, I will be calling CQ and QRV in 472.2 khz from 23 UTC until 24 or so.
See if activated Spain in the band.
TNX to WSPR stations.
 
73 ES HPE CUAGN
 
Federico EA2HB
--------------030502000801080009060803--