Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 710D838000181; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:02:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UpPVr-0001v1-RH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:01:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UpPVr-0001um-E8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:01:55 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UpPVp-0007JR-Cz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:01:54 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r5JL1ptQ000644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:01:51 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r5JL1pMQ013906 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:01:51 +0200 Message-ID: <51C21C3A.5060103@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:01:46 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Federico, I would like to try a QSO with you as well. Maybe we can find a time on friday or saturday, so you can stay up a bit longer? Indeed, e.g. 22 UTC is a much better time for reaching DL than 17 UTC, now due to the summertime. But at least 472.2 kHz is the right QRG to listen on :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: ce0e5a4ae990e5a63db3ab7aea21191b Subject: Re: LF: 630m Spain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404a51c21c8144db X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Federico, I would like to try a QSO with you as well. Maybe we can find a time on friday or saturday, so you can stay up a bit longer? Indeed, e.g. 22 UTC is a much better time for reaching DL than 17 UTC, now due to the summertime. But at least 472.2 kHz is the right QRG to listen on :-) What kind of antenna do you have and what is the antenna current? 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: Did you try to receive signals in WSPR? I even think you decoded me some time ago... Am 19.06.2013 22:20, schrieb Federico: > OK. > > My habitual QRT time is 20 GMT, but today I CQ at 21 GMT in 472,2 khz > Hpe cuagn dr OM. > > Federico EA2HB > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "C. Groeger" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 8:54 PM > Subject: Re: LF: 630m Spain > > >> Hi Frederico, >> I would like to try QSO. >> But I think later in the evening would be better. >> Is 21.00 GMT possible for you? >> 73, df5qg >> >> Christian Groeger >> >> Federico schrieb: >> >>> I've been three weeks calling CQ on the frequency of 472.5 kHz >>> between 17 and 17.30 UTC >>> and listening to the band at different times of day without result. >>> Keep calling CQ between 17 and 17.30. I would appreciate even if >>> negative controls. >>> My signals at 20 km are strong and clean. >>> A possible correspondent at 80 km, is fighting a strong local QRM. >>> My signal does not activate the RX of Twente. >>> My power is close to the maximum allowed. >>> Federico EA2HB >