Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3C82A38000088; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 17:48:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UoKnW-0000rp-IC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:47:42 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UoKnV-0000rg-TS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:47:41 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UoKnT-0003TG-PA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:47:40 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r5GLlcsg005524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:47:38 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r5GLlchY016890 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:47:38 +0200 Message-ID: <51BE3275.5070505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:47:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6CCE2CE4841C49D39BC5810DDC9E4D88@White> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Joe, John , LF, Thanks for watching and the very bright capture :-) Also thanks to Markus for the activity. Apart from LF i can see no big decrease in MF CW activity. Just worked DK2BSN the first time. And I2BBJ, strong and available, as usual! [...] Content analysis details: (-1.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC and DF6NM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad351be32c70012 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Joe, John , LF, Thanks for watching and the very bright capture :-) Also thanks to Markus for the activity. Apart from LF i can see no big decrease in MF CW activity. Just worked DK2BSN the first time. And I2BBJ, strong and available, as usual! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 16.06.2013 04:23, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > > Markus and Stefan, > > A capture from ~0215 utc > > Joe VO1NA > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >