Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C7CCE38000082; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:40:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UmOmu-00013Z-Oz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:39:04 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UmOmu-00013Q-D0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:39:04 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UmOms-0002CZ-J9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:39:03 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r5BDd1im007330 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:39:01 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r5BDcxWx010186 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:38:59 +0200 Message-ID: <51B7286F.9020608@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:38:55 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Chris, Which kind of RX antenna do you use now? A loop? I could give it a try in the afternoon. Now i have to go eating, you know ;-) 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 6ffbd2c9950b634d6cc91f9565b01a8b Subject: Re: LF: CQ 136.500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408251b728c96827 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Chris, Which kind of RX antenna do you use now? A loop? I could give it a try in the afternoon. Now i have to go eating, you know ;-) 73, Stefan Am 11.06.2013 12:53, schrieb C. Groeger: > Thanks for rprt, Mike! > Sri no copy... > > Christian Groeger > > Mike Dennison schrieb: > > >> UR 559 this morning with no QRN. Called a couple of times but you are >> not hearing me. I am running around 0.3W ERP. >> >> Mike, G3XDV >> ========== >> >> >> >>> Hi lf, >>> will be calling cq at 9.30 GMT. >>> Working now with new ant for rx. >>> Mal, will you be qrv? >>> >>> 73, df5qg >>> >>> Christian Groeger >>> >> >> >>