Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A27FC38000088; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 01:52:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UlBzH-0005e7-6S for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2013 06:46:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UlBzD-0005du-80 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2013 06:46:47 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UlBzB-0003eR-1M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2013 06:46:46 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.80] (94-192-110-141.zone6.bethere.co.uk [94.192.110.141]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M2M7w-1UUU101Jpc-00seB8; Sat, 08 Jun 2013 07:46:42 +0200 From: "Dave Sergeant" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 06:46:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <51B2C53E.28007.221084@admin.davesergeant.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.63) Content-description: Mail message body X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:AyrdySviQ1l9+oJ+aC5MeO0dkC3f1st40HeOlWGmTWo mpDSThirVIaOM47Bby5h7SmQsNSjm1peVHJDqveegkqqTZZSZx R1JNj8C8hugcIMpDdSfcxwNYbQAHS+jpjBwGERk8G6IbEM9T7W Zgp1GR148PyEtTP9+2UR/HVpZ16DOwbbg9SAIOYzH51e69tW+t CGlZ7I3Xlnxh7lFTwn9if/n0PxAq5sP7Jnwpqpu7pj0k3X+e2G WpgSyu58JIzvlQyPbleMKC/+R/VQ/bP/nFHujKirFgr0Btl8Vo 1SJaCWhShl8reuulAyfcHgepXQOttHHHxw5SMTcqoWUdEJfsjl F3KFkuengAn+0pLxuhcfxBrKF+YlxGkfNVJ61eUScEEsKDNjDi HY0RYqzCHgFPg== X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I posted this to the Yahoo group yesterday but it has not appeared, in fact there seems a dearth of postings on there. I see from the G100RSGB calendar (http://rsgb.org/main/operating/centenary-station/centenary-station-calendar/) that the Whitton club are proposing to operate on 472kHz when they activate it on June 21st. I am not sure this is allowed under the G100RSGB NOV. Recieved our paperwork yesterday and the accompanying notes clearly say that 60kHz is not allowed. Would have thought the same would have applied for 472kHz. [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.17.8 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.1 FROM_12LTRDOM From a 12-letter domain X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: LF: G100RSGB and 472kHz Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d405851b2c69d5a7d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none I posted this to the Yahoo group yesterday but it has not appeared, in fact there seems a dearth of postings on there. I see from the G100RSGB calendar (http://rsgb.org/main/operating/centenary-station/centenary-station-calendar/) that the Whitton club are proposing to operate on 472kHz when they activate it on June 21st. I am not sure this is allowed under the G100RSGB NOV. Recieved our paperwork yesterday and the accompanying notes clearly say that 60kHz is not allowed. Would have thought the same would have applied for 472kHz. Quoting: "b) Our understanding of the licence is that operation on the 5 MHz channels is not permitted, as the NoV to use the Centenary callsign only modifies the terms and conditions in your main station licence. We have also excluded 5 MHz operation from the related Centenary Award. Taking this line we will also avoid antagonising the Primary User, just after we have completed a 2 year negotiation for improved access to the frequencies." 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergeant.com