Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9BA793800554D; Thu, 2 May 2013 17:57:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UY1UQ-00062B-Kd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:56:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UY1UQ-000622-7z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:56:34 +0100 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UY1UO-0001Nt-Ne for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:56:33 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.16.87]) by mwinf5d51 with ME id X9wC1l0021siNWS039wCRR; Thu, 02 May 2013 23:56:12 +0200 Message-ID: <89B5B0286ADB42C2B55AD96DE206AF11@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 22:56:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: looks like speed , S = 100 Mhz LS = 30 MHz ?? From: Graham Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 10:45 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS divider chip [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: c0e6e8bcdc231effb9da2003d606d9a2 Subject: Re: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B2_01CE4788.3DF40650" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40c95182e14b4e3e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B2_01CE4788.3DF40650 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable looks like speed , S =3D 100 Mhz LS =3D 30 MHz ?? From: Graham=20 Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 10:45 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS divider chip=20 What is the difference anyone ?? Tnx -G. ------=_NextPart_000_00B2_01CE4788.3DF40650 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
looks like   speed  , S =3D 100 Mhz   LS = =3D 30 =20 MHz  ??
 
 

From: Graham
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 10:45 PM
Subject: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or=20 LS

74LS196N    74S196N  Difference  ?? L = or =20 LS     divider   chip
 
What is the  difference  anyone  ??
 
 
 
Tnx -G.
 
  
------=_NextPart_000_00B2_01CE4788.3DF40650--