Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2F6883800009D; Fri, 3 May 2013 02:51:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UY9ot-0007Ou-FY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 07:50:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UY9os-0007Ol-N1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 07:50:14 +0100 Received: from mail.uk.thalesgroup.com ([192.93.164.29] helo=Alfaes01.gwserv.thalesgroup.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UY9oq-0002Mz-Ky for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 07:50:13 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,602,1363132800"; d="scan'208,217";a="58718506" Received: from echoes01.gwserv.thalesgroup.com (HELO gwserv.thalesgroup.com) ([172.31.141.5]) by Alfaes01.gwserv.thalesgroup.com with ESMTP; 03 May 2013 07:50:11 +0100 Received: from ([10.177.21.161]) by echoes01.gwserv.thalesgroup.com with ESMTP id 8BYFQH1.49969122; Fri, 03 May 2013 07:50:07 +0100 Received: from THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp ([10.177.21.21]) by THSONEP02MSG02P.one-02-priv.grp ([10.177.21.161]) with mapi; Fri, 3 May 2013 07:50:07 +0100 From: REEVES Paul To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 07:50:04 +0100 Thread-Topic: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS Thread-Index: Ac5HftgHjsEI7uLCS2umIRXKPpUvQwASpORw Message-ID: <776311A518F6F642962EC561A9184090D4DE39E288@THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 192.93.164.29 (mail.uk.thalesgroup.com) used invalid HELO/EHLO Alfaes01.gwserv.thalesgroup.com - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -7.6 (-------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hasn't anyone still got their copy of the TI 'TTL Data Book'? Absolutely the bible on such things back in the 70s/80s - I've still got mine (plus supplements) - and in hardback too! TI knew how engineers mistreat their books....... Still need it due to boxes of 'spare' TTL waiting for a project. Of course, everyone uses FPGAs now :-( [...] Content analysis details: (-7.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [192.93.164.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 6ae5fe68d6708d1e4a9cbdf0f0af43e5 Subject: LF: RE: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_776311A518F6F642962EC561A9184090D4DE39E288THSONEP02CMB0_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d409051835e80190e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --_000_776311A518F6F642962EC561A9184090D4DE39E288THSONEP02CMB0_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hasn't anyone still got their copy of the TI 'TTL Data Book'? Absolutely = the bible on such things back in the 70s/80s - I've still got mine (plus su= pplements) - and in hardback too! TI knew how engineers mistreat their book= s....... Still need it due to boxes of 'spare' TTL waiting for a project.= Of course, everyone uses FPGAs now :-( 73's Paul G8GJA From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacks= heep.org] On Behalf Of Graham Sent: 02 May 2013 22:46 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS divider chip What is the difference anyone ?? Tnx -G. --_000_776311A518F6F642962EC561A9184090D4DE39E288THSONEP02CMB0_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hasn't anyone still got their copy of the TI  'TTL Data Book'?  Absolutely the bible on such things back in the 70s/80s - I've still got mine (plus supplements) - and in hardback too! TI knew how engine= ers mistreat their books…….   Still need it due to boxes = of 'spare' TTL waiting for a project. Of course, everyone uses FPGAs now :-(

 

73's

Paul      G8GJA

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mai= lto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Graham
Sent: 02 May 2013 22:46
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS

 

74LS196N    74S196N  Difference&nb= sp; ?? L or  LS     divider   chip <= /p>

 

What is the  difference  anyone  ?= ?

 

 

 

Tnx -G.

 

  

--_000_776311A518F6F642962EC561A9184090D4DE39E288THSONEP02CMB0_--